Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castagno, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Matsen, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castagno, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Matsen, F. A.

Radiology, Vol 165, 759-762, Copyright © 1987 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Complex fractures of the proximal humerus: role of CT in treatment

AA Castagno, WP Shuman, RF Kilcoyne, DR Haynor, ME Morris and FA Matsen
Department of Radiology, University of Washington Hospital, Seattle 98195.

The authors reviewed the computed tomography (CT) scans, plain radiographs, and subsequent treatment of 17 patients with complex proximal humeral fractures. CT scans and radiographs were compared in the demonstration of fracture lines, displacement of fracture fragments, rotation of fragments relative to their normal positions, and status of the head and articular surface of the humerus. The impact of CT findings on the decision to treat with surgery versus closed reduction and on the choice of surgical procedure was assessed. Surgery was not performed in nine patients because CT scans showed no significant displacement of fragments previously judged displaced or "indeterminate" on radiographs. Surgery was performed in eight patients; CT demonstrated significant abnormalities not definitely shown with radiography. In six of these eight patients, CT scans demonstrated unsuspected abnormalities that directed the choice of surgical procedure. CT scans provide clinically useful information for the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures when radiographs provide inadequate or indefinite information.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
M. S. George
Fractures of the Greater Tuberosity of the Humerus
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., October 1, 2007; 15(10): 607 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. Doornberg, A. Lindenhovius, P. Kloen, C. N. van Dijk, D. Zurakowski, and D. Ring
Two and Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography for the Classification and Management of Distal Humeral Fractures. Evaluation of Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2006; 88(8): 1795 - 1801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1987 by the Radiological Society of North America.