Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evens, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Evens, R. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evens, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Evens, R. G., Jr

Radiology, Vol 166, 27-30, Copyright © 1988 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Economic and utilization analysis of MR imaging units in the United States in 1987

RG Evens and RG Evens Jr
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis 63110.

The 72 most experienced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging installations were surveyed for operational and economic data from January or February 1987. The typical MR imaging installation was operating 69 hours and examining 58 patients per week, with 82% of the studies being neuroradiologic. The mean fees were $545-$603 for the technical component and $111-$232 for the professional component, with a higher charge for body procedures. The mean annual gross revenues were $1,193,000, and revenues after deductions totaled $1,014,000. Estimated expenses for a typical MR imaging installation were $968,000, with a net annual revenue of $46,000 or more. Compared with 1985 data from the same study group, weekly patient volume and hours of operation have increased--from 35 to 58 patients and from 54 to 69 hours. Installations are more efficient, as the number of patients examined per hour has increased from 0.6 to 0.8. Demand for MR imaging is growing, as the outpatient scheduling delay has increased from 5.3 to 11.4 days. The financial position of MR imaging units has markedly improved from a previous loss of $460,000 to an estimated current gain of +46,000 or more annually. MR imaging installations have shown improvement by several objective criteria - patient throughput, operational efficiency, and financial net revenues.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1988 by the Radiological Society of North America.