Radiology, Vol 167, 353-358, Copyright © 1988 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Nonpalpable breast lesions: recommendations for biopsy based on suspicion of carcinoma at mammography

FM Hall, JM Storella, DZ Silverstone and G Wyshak
Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Hospital, Boston, MA 02215.

Carcinoma was found in 30% (119 of 400) of biopsy specimens obtained for mammographically suspicious but nonpalpable findings. The authors reviewed the mammograms of these 400 cases without knowledge of the biopsy results and placed each examination into one of four groups based on their suspicion for carcinoma: minimal (n = 82), slight (n = 91), moderate (n = 174), and high (n = 53). In 127 cases, mammograms showed either minimally suspicious calcifications (n = 33) or minimally (n = 49) or slightly (n = 45) suspicious masses. A 4.7% (six of 127) rate of carcinoma was found in these groups; five of the six cancers were in situ. Had follow-up mammography been done rather than biopsy for these 127 less suspicious lesions, it is probable that the delay in diagnosis would not have altered overall prognosis. In the remaining 273 patients, the positive predictive value of mammography for carcinoma would have risen from 30% (119 of 400) to 41% (113 of 273). The authors conclude that in the management of suspicious nonpalpable mammographic findings, the rate of carcinoma for lesions at biopsy can approximate 40%. This is almost double the rate of most published series.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Gunhan-Bilgen and A. Oktay Management of Microcalcifications Developing at the Lumpectomy Bed After Conservative Surgery and Radiation Therapy Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2007; 188(2): 393 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Schnall, J. Blume, D. A. Bluemke, G. A. DeAngelis, N. DeBruhl, S. Harms, S. H. Heywang-Kobrunner, N. Hylton, C. K. Kuhl, E. D. Pisano, et al. Diagnostic Architectural and Dynamic Features at Breast MR Imaging: Multicenter Study Radiology, January 1, 2006; 238(1): 42 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A. Bluemke, C. A. Gatsonis, M. H. Chen, G. A. DeAngelis, N. DeBruhl, S. Harms, S. H. Heywang-Kobrunner, N. Hylton, C. K. Kuhl, C. Lehman, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Breast Prior to Biopsy JAMA, December 8, 2004; 292(22): 2735 - 2742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Golub, C. L. Bennett, T. Stinson, L. Venta, and M. Morrow Cost Minimization Study of Image-Guided Core Biopsy Versus Surgical Excisional Biopsy for Women With Abnormal Mammograms J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2004; 22(12): 2430 - 2437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Yasmeen, P. S. Romano, M. Pettinger, R. T. Chlebowski, J. A. Robbins, D. S. Lane, and S. L. Hendrix Frequency and Predictive Value of a Mammographic Recommendation for Short-Interval Follow-Up J Natl Cancer Inst, March 19, 2003; 95(6): 429 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Chen, B. G. Haffty, and C. H. Lee Local Recurrence of Breast Cancer after Breast Conservation Therapy in Patients Examined by Means of Stereotactic Core-Needle Biopsy Radiology, December 1, 2002; 225(3): 707 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. Varas, J. H. Leborgne, F. Leborgne, J. Mezzera, S. Jaumandreu, and F. Leborgne Revisiting the Mammographic Follow-Up of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 691 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Becker, D. Taves, L. McCurdy, G. Muscedere, S. Karlik, and S. Ward Stereotactic Core Biopsy of Breast Microcalcifications: Comparison of Film Versus Digital Mammography, Both Using an Add-On Unit Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1451 - 1457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Stanley Inherent Dangers in Radiologic Screening Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2001; 177(5): 989 - 992. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. E. Floyd Jr., J. Y. Lo, and G. D. Tourassi Case-Based Reasoning Computer Algorithm that Uses Mammographic Findings for Breast Biopsy Decisions Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2000; 175(5): 1347 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. K. Moon, J.-G. Im, D.-Y. Noh, and M. C. Han Nonpalpable Breast Lesions: Evaluation with Power Doppler US and a Microbubble Contrast Agent-Initial Experience Radiology, October 1, 2000; 217(1): 240 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				T. Osanai, N. Gomi, T. Wakita, T. Yamashita, W. Ichikawa, Z. Nihei, and K. Sugihara Ultrasound-guided Core Needle Biopsy for Breast Cancer: Preliminary Report Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2000; 30(2): 65 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Sickles Probably Benign Breast Lesions: When Should Follow-up Be Recommended and What Is the Optimal Follow-up Protocol? Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 11 - 14. [Full Text]

				E. Rubin Six-month Follow-up: An Alternative View Radiology, October 1, 1999; 213(1): 15 - 18. [Full Text]

				S. G. Orel, N. Kay, C. Reynolds, and D. C. Sullivan BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 845 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. S. Foster Jr and W. C. Wood Alternative Strategies in the Management of Primary Breast Cancer Arch Surg, November 1, 1998; 133(11): 1182 - 1186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Silen, T. A. Gaskin, C. J. D'Orsi, J. A. Swets, F. M. Hall, J. G. Elmore, C. K. Wells, and A. R. Feinstein Variability in the Interpretation of Mammograms N. Engl. J. Med., April 27, 1995; 332(17): 1171 - 1173. [Full Text]

				W. A. Berg, C. L. Arnoldus, E. Teferra, and M. Bhargavan Biopsy of Amorphous Breast Calcifications: Pathologic Outcome and Yield at Stereotactic Biopsy Radiology, November 1, 2001; 221(2): 495 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]