Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weinreb, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Maravilla, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weinreb, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Maravilla, K. R.

Radiology, Vol 170, 125-128, Copyright © 1989 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Prevalence of lumbosacral intervertebral disk abnormalities on MR images in pregnant and asymptomatic nonpregnant women

JC Weinreb, LB Wolbarsht, JM Cohen, CE Brown and KR Maravilla
Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016.

The prevalence of lumbosacral intervertebral disk bulge and herniation on sagittal magnetic resonance (MR) images was determined in 45 pregnant subjects and 41 asymptomatic nonpregnant women of childbearing age. MR technique differed for the pregnant and nonpregnant groups. Fifty-three percent of pregnant and 54% of nonpregnant women had an abnormal disk (bulge or herniation) at one or more levels (L3-4, L4-5, or L5-S1). The difference was not statistically significant. There was also no significant difference in the distribution of outcomes among the 45 pregnant subjects, 17 parous nonpregnant women, and 24 nulliparous women. The results suggest that lumbosacral disk bulges or herniations are common in women of childbearing age, whether pregnant or not, and that, contrary to an earlier report, pregnant women do not have an increased prevalence of disk abnormalities.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
C. A. Wong, B. M. Scavone, S. Dugan, J. C. Smith, H. Prather, J. N. Ganchiff, and R. J. McCarthy
Incidence of Postpartum Lumbosacral Spine and Lower Extremity Nerve Injuries
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2003; 101(2): 279 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. G. Jarvik and R. A. Deyo
Diagnostic Evaluation of Low Back Pain with Emphasis on Imaging
Ann Intern Med, October 1, 2002; 137(7): 586 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. G. Borenstein, J. W. O'Mara, S. D. Boden, W. C. Lauerman, A. Jacobson, C. Platenberg, D. Schellinger, and S. W. Wiesel
The Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine to Predict Low-Back Pain in Asymptomatic Subjects : A Seven-Year Follow-up Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2001; 83(9): 1306 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Weishaupt, M. R. Schmid, M. Zanetti, N. Boos, B. Romanowski, R. O. Kissling, J. Dvorak, and J. Hodler
Positional MR Imaging of the Lumbar Spine: Does It Demonstrate Nerve Root Compromise Not Visible at Conventional MR Imaging?
Radiology, April 1, 2000; 215(1): 247 - 253.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin RehabilHome page
L. Tesio, A. Raschi, and M. Meroni
Autotraction treatment for low-back pain in pregnancy: a pilot study
Clinical Rehabilitation, November 1, 1994; 8(4): 314 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. C. Jensen, M. N. Brant-Zawadzki, N. Obuchowski, M. T. Modic, D. Malkasian, and J. S. Ross
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine in People without Back Pain
N. Engl. J. Med., July 14, 1994; 331(2): 69 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. D. Goldstein, P. E. Berger, G. E. Windler, and D. W. Jackson
Spine injuries in gymnasts and swimmers: An epidemiologic investigation
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1991; 19(5): 463 - 468.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1989 by the Radiological Society of North America.