Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bramble, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hensley, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bramble, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hensley, K. S.

Radiology, Vol 170, 133-136, Copyright © 1989 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Image data compression in magnification hand radiographs

JM Bramble, LT Cook, MD Murphey, NL Martin, WH Anderson and KS Hensley
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City 66103.

A study was conducted on the use of an irreversible compression technique, Fourier quantization, to reduce the amount of digital data needed for an image. The effect of image compression was studied in radiographs obtained to diagnose subperiosteal bone resorption. Magnification radiographs of 44 hands were digitized to an array size of 4,096 X 4,096 X 12 bits. Selected subregions containing a single middle phalanx were compressed and reconstructed. A subset of the resultant 12-bit uncompressed and 8-, 7-, and 6-bit compressed images were read by four radiologists whose responses were analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) techniques. There were 81 images used in the ROC analysis, of which 48 were normal and 33 showed subperiosteal resorption. No statistically significant loss of diagnostic quality was detected for 8- or 7-bit compressed images, with average compression ratios of 16:1 and 28:1, respectively. Diagnostic quality was lost with 6-bit images, with an average compression ratio of 107:1.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1989 by the Radiological Society of North America.