Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dowlatshahi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sprenger, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dowlatshahi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sprenger, E.

Radiology, Vol 170, 427-433, Copyright © 1989 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with stereotaxic localization and fine-needle aspiration

K Dowlatshahi, HJ Gent, R Schmidt, PM Jokich, M Bibbo and E Sprenger
Department of General Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612.

Modern mammography is the most effective means of detecting nonpalpable breast cancers, but correct diagnosis for malignancy is made in only 20%-30% of the cases. The conventional method of lesion localization usually results in approximate placement of the hookwire in the breast. The authors report the results of stereotaxic localization, combined with fine-needle aspiration and cytologic study, performed in 528 cases. Clinically occult breast lesions were localized precisely (within 2 mm 96% of the time), sampled by means of a 23-gauge needle, and marked with either methylene blue or a hookwire for subsequent open excisional biopsy. The results indicate a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 91%, and accuracy of 92% for the fine-needle aspiration procedure. This technique offers a significantly improved preoperative method of diagnosing small breast lesions with minimal pain, no complications, reduced cost, and no disfigurement or scar interfering with subsequent mammographic follow-up.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
R. M. Golub, C. L. Bennett, T. Stinson, L. Venta, and M. Morrow
Cost Minimization Study of Image-Guided Core Biopsy Versus Surgical Excisional Biopsy for Women With Abnormal Mammograms
J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2004; 22(12): 2430 - 2437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
K. J. Kirshenbaum, T. Voruganti, C. Overbeeke, M. D. Kirshenbaum, P. Patel, G. Kaplan, V. Maker, C. August, and R. P. Cavallino
Stereotactic Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions Using a Conventional Mammography Unit with an Add-On Device
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 527 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. D. Pisano, L. L. Fajardo, D. J. Caudry, N. Sneige, W. J. Frable, W. A. Berg, I. Tocino, S. J. Schnitt, J. L. Connolly, C. A. Gatsonis, et al.
Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions in a Multicenter Clinical Trial: Results from the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V
Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 785 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch SurgHome page
K. Dowlatshahi, M. Fan, V. E. Gould, K. J. Bloom, and A. Ali
Stereotactically Guided Laser Therapy of Occult Breast Tumors: Work-in-Progress Report
Arch Surg, November 1, 2000; 135(11): 1345 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
S. H. Parker, M. A. Dennis, A. T. Stavros, and K. K. Johnson
Ultrasound-Guided Mamtmeotomoy: A New Breast Biopsy Technique
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, May 1, 1996; 12(3): 113 - 118.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1989 by the Radiological Society of North America.