Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Luetmer, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Luetmer, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, E. M.

Radiology, Vol 171, 353-357, Copyright © 1989 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Chronic pancreatitis: reassessment with current CT

PH Luetmer, DH Stephens and EM Ward
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.

A retrospective analysis was performed of contrast material-enhanced current-generation computed tomographic (CT) examinations in 56 patients with documented chronic pancreatitis. Dilatation of the main pancreatic duct was seen in 68% of cases, parenchymal atrophy in 54%, pancreatic calcifications in 50%, fluid collections in 30%, focal pancreatic enlargement in 30%, biliary ductal dilatation in 29%, and alterations in peripancreatic fat or fascia in 16%. The relatively small proportion of examinations in which no abnormalities were observed, 7%, differs from that in early reports, as does the absence of generalized pancreatic enlargement. Pancreatic ductal dilatation and parenchymal atrophy were notably more prevalent than reported previously. Nine of the 17 patients with focal pancreatic enlargement had calculi within the mass, which suggested benign disease; of the eight other patients, two of whom had coexistent carcinoma, this finding was absent and the masses were considered indeterminate at CT.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
P D Thomas, A Forbes, J Green, P Howdle, R Long, R Playford, M Sheridan, R Stevens, R Valori, J Walters, et al.
Guidelines for the investigation of chronic diarrhoea, 2nd edition
Gut, July 1, 2003; 52(90005): v1 - 15.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. Kim, T. Murakami, M. Takamura, M. Hori, S. Takahashi, S. Nakamori, M. Sakon, Y. Tanji, K. Wakasa, and H. Nakamura
Pancreatic Mass Due to Chronic Pancreatitis: Correlation of CT and MR Imaging Features with Pathologic Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 367 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Manfredi, G. Costamagna, M. G. Brizi, G. Maresca, A. Vecchioli, C. Colagrande, and P. Marano
Severe Chronic Pancreatitis versus Suspected Pancreatic Disease: Dynamic MR Cholangiopancreatography after Secretin Stimulation
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 849 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
A. S. Fulcher and M. A. Turner
MR Pancreatography: A Useful Tool for Evaluating Pancreatic Disorders
RadioGraphics, January 1, 1999; 19(1): 5 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
B Gouyon, P Levy, P Ruszniewski, M Zins, P Hammel, V Vilgrain, A Sauvanet, J Belghiti, and P Bernades
Predictive factors in the outcome of pseudocysts complicating alcoholic chronic pancreatitis
Gut, December 1, 1997; 41(6): 821 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. L. Steer, I. Waxman, and S. Freedman
Chronic Pancreatitis
N. Engl. J. Med., June 1, 1995; 332(22): 1482 - 1490.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1989 by the Radiological Society of North America.