Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zawin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Comite, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zawin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Comite, F.

Radiology, Vol 171, 693-696, Copyright © 1989 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Endometriosis: appearance and detection at MR imaging

M Zawin, S McCarthy, L Scoutt and F Comite
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.

Thirty-nine magnetic resonance (MR) studies were performed on 31 women with surgically proved endometriosis. A total of 88 endometriotic lesions ranging in size from 0.2 to 7.5 cm were detected on 24 of 30 MR images of women. The signal intensities ranged from hyperintense on all pulse sequences (41 of 88) to hypointense on all sequences (24 of 88); the remainder demonstrated signal intensities corresponding to the appearances of acute, subacute, and chronic hematomas. Hypointense or signal-void rims on both T1- and T2-weighted images were detected in 35 lesions. Identification of the disease with MR imaging versus concurrent surgery was compared for 76 sites in 19 patients. Findings were true-positive in 24 cases, false-negative in ten, true-negative in 32, and false-positive in seven, resulting in an MR sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 82%. Adhesions obscured the disease at laparoscopy in three patients. MR imaging cannot be used as a substitute for laparoscopy in the definitive diagnosis or staging of endometriosis. However, it can be used to monitor treatment response in place of laparoscopy once a diagnosis is firmly established.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. Del Frate, R. Girometti, M. Pittino, G. Del Frate, M. Bazzocchi, and C. Zuiani
Deep Retroperitoneal Pelvic Endometriosis: MR Imaging Appearance with Laparoscopic Correlation
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2006; 26(6): 1705 - 1718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. L. Kataoka, K. Togashi, T. Yamaoka, T. Koyama, H. Ueda, H. Kobayashi, M. Rahman, T. Higuchi, and S. Fujii
Posterior Cul-de-Sac Obliteration Associated with Endometriosis: MR Imaging Evaluation
Radiology, March 1, 2005; 234(3): 815 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Bazot, E. Darai, R. Hourani, I. Thomassin, A. Cortez, S. Uzan, and J.-N. Buy
Deep Pelvic Endometriosis: MR Imaging for Diagnosis and Prediction of Extension of Disease
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 379 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. M. Glastonbury
The Shading Sign
Radiology, July 1, 2002; 224(1): 199 - 201.
[Full Text]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
P. J. Woodward, R. Sohaey, and T. P. Mezzetti Jr
Endometriosis: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2001; 21(1): 193 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. E. Frye, S. M. Ascher, and D. Thomasson
MR Hysterosalpingography: Protocol Development and Refinement for Simulating Normal and Abnormal Fallopian Tube Patency-Feasibility Study with a Phantom1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. L. Olive and L. B. Schwartz
Endometriosis
N. Engl. J. Med., June 17, 1993; 328(24): 1759 - 1769.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1989 by the Radiological Society of North America.