Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trerotola, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trerotola, S. O.
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, J. L.

Radiology, Vol 171, 735-738, Copyright © 1989 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy: postoperative evaluation

SO Trerotola, B Jones, DW Crist and JL Cameron
Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21205.

The pylorus-preserving Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy is becoming a popular alternative to the standard Whipple operation. Fluoroscopy plays an important role in postoperative assessment. The authors evaluated images of 50 consecutive patients who had undergone the newer procedure. Thirty-one complications were identified. Two normal variants that could be confused with abnormalities were noted: (a) the featureless appearance of the duodenal bulb may be mistaken for extravasation, and (b) contrastmaterial filling of the proximal jejunal loop at an end-to-end anastomosis with retained invaginated pancreas may be mistaken for intussusception. Another pitfall was failure to evaluate the pancreaticojejunostomy anastomosis fully, resulting in false-negative radiologic interpretations when leaks were present. The approach to postoperative examination of patients who have undergone the pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure is different from that of patients who have undergone the standard procedure. Radiologists should be familiar with this approach, the normal postoperative anatomy, and pitfalls in imaging so that complications can be diagnosed and treated.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1989 by the Radiological Society of North America.