Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ikeda, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ikeda, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Andersson, I.

Radiology, Vol 172, 661-666, Copyright © 1989 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances

DM Ikeda and I Andersson
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0326.

The authors retrospectively analyzed the mammograms of 190 women with biopsy-proved ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Excluded from the current study were 117 (62%) women whose radiographs showed suspicious clustered microcalcifications, a well-known finding in DCIS. Of the remaining 73 (38%) women, 30 (16%) had negative mammograms, and 43 (23%) had mammographic manifestations of breast malignancy other than microcalcifications. Of the latter 43, 15 had circumscribed masses, and 12 had various focal nodular patterns. The remaining 16 patients showed other mammographic signs of malignancy, including asymmetry (n = 1); dilated retroareolar ducts (n = 2); ill-defined, rounded tumor (n = 2); focal architectural distortion (n = 4); subareolar mass (n = 3); and developing density (n = 4). Of the 73 women in the study, 60 presented with clinical findings related to the tumor. Since DCIS has a high survival rate with proper treatment, radiologists should be aware of the unusual radiographic manifestations of this disease.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. J. Shin, H. H. Kim, S. M. Kim, G. Y. Kwon, G. Gong, and O. K. Cho
Screening-Detected and Symptomatic Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Differences in the Sonographic and Pathologic Features
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 516 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Jansen, G. M. Newstead, H. Abe, A. Shimauchi, R. A. Schmidt, and G. S. Karczmar
Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Kinetic and Morphologic MR Characteristics Compared with Mammographic Appearance and Nuclear Grade
Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 684 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
D. K. Kang, G. S. Jeon, H. Yim, and Y. S. Jung
Diagnosis of the Intraductal Component of Invasive Breast Cancer: Assessment With Mammography and Sonography
J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2007; 26(11): 1587 - 1600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. C. Boughey, R. J. Gonzalez, E. Bonner, and H. M. Kuerer
Current Treatment and Clinical Trial Developments for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
Oncologist, November 1, 2007; 12(11): 1276 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Suryanarayanan, A. Karellas, S. Vedantham, I. Sechopoulos, and C. J. D'Orsi
Detection of Simulated Microcalcifications in a Phantom with Digital Mammography: Effect of Pixel Size
Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 130 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. W. T. Leung and E. A. Sickles
Developing Asymmetry Identified on Mammography: Correlation with Imaging Outcome and Pathologic Findings
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 667 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
B. E. Dogan, K. Ceyhan, S. Tukel, S. Saylisoy, and G. J. Whitman
Ductal Dilatation as the Manifesting Sign of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2005; 24(10): 1413 - 1417.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. F. Stein, G. Zisman, J. A. Rapelyea, A. M. Schwartz, B. Abell, and R. F. Brem
Lobular Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast Presenting as a Mass
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1799 - 1801.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. A. Berg, L. Gutierrez, M. S. NessAiver, W. B. Carter, M. Bhargavan, R. S. Lewis, and O. B. Ioffe
Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer
Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 830 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. T. Yang and G. M. K. Tse
Sonographic, Mammographic, and Histopathologic Correlation of Symptomatic Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 101 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
M. Morrow, E. A. Strom, L. W. Bassett, D. D. Dershaw, B. Fowble, J. R. Harris, F. O'Malley, S. J. Schnitt, S. E. Singletary, and D. P. Winchester
Standard for the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast (DCIS)
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2002; 52(5): 256 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
M. Sato, T. Fukutomi, S. Akashi-Tanaka, K. Miyakawa, N. Yamamoto, and T. Hasegawa
Accuracy in Estimating Tumor Extension According to Mammographic Subtypes in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2002; 32(5): 157 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
W. K. Moon, J. S. Myung, Y. J. Lee, I. A. Park, D.-Y. Noh, and J.-G. Im
US of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
RadioGraphics, March 1, 2002; 22(2): 269 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. T. Harris
Case 41: Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 770 - 773.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1989 by the Radiological Society of North America.