|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 172, 661-666, Copyright © 1989 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
DM Ikeda and I Andersson
Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0326.
The authors retrospectively analyzed the mammograms of 190 women with biopsy-proved ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Excluded from the current study were 117 (62%) women whose radiographs showed suspicious clustered microcalcifications, a well-known finding in DCIS. Of the remaining 73 (38%) women, 30 (16%) had negative mammograms, and 43 (23%) had mammographic manifestations of breast malignancy other than microcalcifications. Of the latter 43, 15 had circumscribed masses, and 12 had various focal nodular patterns. The remaining 16 patients showed other mammographic signs of malignancy, including asymmetry (n = 1); dilated retroareolar ducts (n = 2); ill-defined, rounded tumor (n = 2); focal architectural distortion (n = 4); subareolar mass (n = 3); and developing density (n = 4). Of the 73 women in the study, 60 presented with clinical findings related to the tumor. Since DCIS has a high survival rate with proper treatment, radiologists should be aware of the unusual radiographic manifestations of this disease.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. J. Shin, H. H. Kim, S. M. Kim, G. Y. Kwon, G. Gong, and O. K. Cho Screening-Detected and Symptomatic Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Differences in the Sonographic and Pathologic Features Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 516 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Jansen, G. M. Newstead, H. Abe, A. Shimauchi, R. A. Schmidt, and G. S. Karczmar Pure Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Kinetic and Morphologic MR Characteristics Compared with Mammographic Appearance and Nuclear Grade Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 684 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. K. Kang, G. S. Jeon, H. Yim, and Y. S. Jung Diagnosis of the Intraductal Component of Invasive Breast Cancer: Assessment With Mammography and Sonography J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2007; 26(11): 1587 - 1600. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Boughey, R. J. Gonzalez, E. Bonner, and H. M. Kuerer Current Treatment and Clinical Trial Developments for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast Oncologist, November 1, 2007; 12(11): 1276 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Suryanarayanan, A. Karellas, S. Vedantham, I. Sechopoulos, and C. J. D'Orsi Detection of Simulated Microcalcifications in a Phantom with Digital Mammography: Effect of Pixel Size Radiology, July 1, 2007; 244(1): 130 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. T. Leung and E. A. Sickles Developing Asymmetry Identified on Mammography: Correlation with Imaging Outcome and Pathologic Findings Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 667 - 675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Dogan, K. Ceyhan, S. Tukel, S. Saylisoy, and G. J. Whitman Ductal Dilatation as the Manifesting Sign of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma J. Ultrasound Med., October 1, 2005; 24(10): 1413 - 1417. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. F. Stein, G. Zisman, J. A. Rapelyea, A. M. Schwartz, B. Abell, and R. F. Brem Lobular Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast Presenting as a Mass Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2005; 184(6): 1799 - 1801. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Berg, L. Gutierrez, M. S. NessAiver, W. B. Carter, M. Bhargavan, R. S. Lewis, and O. B. Ioffe Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast Cancer Radiology, December 1, 2004; 233(3): 830 - 849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. T. Yang and G. M. K. Tse Sonographic, Mammographic, and Histopathologic Correlation of Symptomatic Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2004; 182(1): 101 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Morrow, E. A. Strom, L. W. Bassett, D. D. Dershaw, B. Fowble, J. R. Harris, F. O'Malley, S. J. Schnitt, S. E. Singletary, and D. P. Winchester Standard for the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast (DCIS) CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2002; 52(5): 256 - 276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sato, T. Fukutomi, S. Akashi-Tanaka, K. Miyakawa, N. Yamamoto, and T. Hasegawa Accuracy in Estimating Tumor Extension According to Mammographic Subtypes in Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2002; 32(5): 157 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. Moon, J. S. Myung, Y. J. Lee, I. A. Park, D.-Y. Noh, and J.-G. Im US of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ RadioGraphics, March 1, 2002; 22(2): 269 - 281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Harris Case 41: Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 770 - 773. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |