Radiology, Vol 174, 343-347, Copyright © 1990 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Visibility of gallstone fragments at US and fluoroscopy: implications for monitoring gallstone lithotripsy

BS Garra, WJ Davros, EE Lack, SC Horii, PM Silverman and RK Zeman
Department of Radiology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007.

To assess the value of ultrasound (US), fluoroscopy, and spot radiography in the detection, counting, and measurement of gallstone fragments during lithotripsy, in vitro visibility studies were conducted on fragments from 20 stones. Fluoroscopic visibility was evaluated during and after lithotripsy on 185 fragments placed in an anthropomorphic phantom. Three US experiments were performed on the fragments to study the visibility of fragments as a function of size, the accuracy of the count with large numbers of fragments, and the ability of observers to detect and count fragments larger than both 4 mm and 5 mm. With fluoroscopy, fragment detection rates ranged from 20% (fragments larger than 2.5 mm) to 80% (fragments larger than 4.5 mm). With US, all fragments larger than 1.5 mm were detected, and US was significantly better than fluoroscopy and spot radiography for detection of fragments 2.5 mm or smaller. US was also more accurate than fluoroscopy (11% vs 59% error) in the assessment of the number of fragments. When fragments larger than 4 mm or 5 mm were being counted with US, 92% of the fragments were visualized. The results suggest that US is more accurate for monitoring gallstone lithotripsy than fluoroscopy or spot radiography.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Jeraj Cholelithasis: The Optimum Maneuvers to Improve Sonographic Assessment for Biliary Lithotripsy Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1992; 8(2): 64 - 67. [Abstract] [PDF]