Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forman, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kirks, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forman, H. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kirks, D. R.

Radiology, Vol 175, 127-129, Copyright © 1990 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Clinical activities of pediatric radiologists in the United States and Canada: 10-year follow-up

HP Forman, JC Leonidas and DR Kirks
Department of Radiology, Schneider Children's Hospital, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY 10042.

The members of the Society for Pediatric Radiology were surveyed in 1989 about their involvement with newer imaging modalities. Results were compared with those obtained in a similar study performed 10 years earlier. The performance and monitoring of imaging studies increased dramatically, with most respondents now being involved with ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT), and almost one-half involved with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. When equipment became available, pediatric radiologists were quicker to assume control of MR imaging than US and CT. In most large pediatric centers, imaging with all current modalities and of all organ systems has become the responsibility of pediatric radiologists. These findings are in contrast to those obtained in 1979, when pediatric imaging practices primarily consisted of conventional radiography and fluoroscopy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. R. Kirks, R. T. Bramson, and G. A. Taylor
"You can see a lot just by observing," but ...
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 301 - 303.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Merewitz and J. H. Sunshine
A Portrait of Pediatric Radiologists in the United States
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2006; 186(1): 12 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. P. Forman, J. Traubici, A. M. Covey, D. S. Kamin, J. C. Leonidas, and J. H. Sunshine
Pediatric Radiology at the Millennium
Radiology, July 1, 2001; 220(1): 109 - 114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1990 by the Radiological Society of North America.