Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kier, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, P. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kier, R.
Right arrow Articles by Schwartz, P. E.

Radiology, Vol 176, 709-713, Copyright © 1990 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Pelvic masses in pregnancy: MR imaging

R Kier, SM McCarthy, LM Scoutt, RR Viscarello and PE Schwartz
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.

The value of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was assessed for 17 pregnant patients with sonograms suggestive of a pelvic mass. The MR imaging signal features improved lesion characterization in 47% (eight of 17) of cases, including two of four mature cystic teratomas of the ovary, three uterine fibroids, one solid ovarian tumor, one endometrioma, and a distended urinary bladder that had been mistaken for an ovarian cystic mass. Both MR imaging and sonography were accurate for the characterization of three ovarian cystadenomas and two simple ovarian cysts. On both MR images and sonograms, two simple ovarian cysts were incorrectly diagnosed as complex cystic masses and one teratoma was incorrectly diagnosed as a simple cyst. The origin of the pelvic mass (13 in the ovary, three in the uterus, and one distended urinary bladder) was accurately determined on 100% (17 of 17) of the MR images versus 71% (12 of 17) of the sonograms. In three cases, the results of MR imaging led to cancellation of surgery, which would have proceeded on the basis of the sonographic results alone. MR imaging is a valuable complement to sonography for preoperative evaluation of pelvic masses in pregnant patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
J A Spencer
A multidisciplinary approach to ovarian cancer at diagnosis
Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(Special_Issue_2): S94 - S102.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Oto, R. D. Ernst, R. Shah, M. Koroglu, G. Chaljub, A. F. Gei, N. Zacharias, and G. Saade
Right-Lower-Quadrant Pain and Suspected Appendicitis in Pregnant Women: Evaluation with MR Imaging--Initial Experience
Radiology, February 1, 2005; 234(2): 445 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. D. Eyvazzadeh, I. Pedrosa, N. M. Rofsky, B. Siewert, N. Farrar, J. Abbott, and D. Levine
MRI of Right-Sided Abdominal Pain in Pregnancy
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2004; 183(4): 907 - 914.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. R. Leyendecker, V. Gorengaut, and J. J. Brown
MR Imaging of Maternal Diseases of the Abdomen and Pelvis during Pregnancy and the Immediate Postpartum Period
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2004; 24(5): 1301 - 1316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
G. Chiang and D. Levine
Imaging of Adnexal Masses in Pregnancy
J. Ultrasound Med., June 1, 2004; 23(6): 805 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Nagayama, Y. Watanabe, A. Okumura, Y. Amoh, S. Nakashita, and Y. Dodo
Fast MR Imaging in Obstetrics
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2002; 22(3): 563 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
E. Murase, E. S. Siegelman, E. K. Outwater, L. A. Perez-Jaffe, and R. W. Tureck
Uterine Leiomyomas: Histopathologic Features, MR Imaging Findings, Differential Diagnosis, and Treatment
RadioGraphics, September 1, 1999; 19(5): 1179 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. Levine, P. D. Barnes, and R. R. Edelman
Obstetric MR Imaging
Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 609 - 617.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1990 by the Radiological Society of North America.