Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Souza, B.
Right arrow Articles by Di Chiro, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Souza, B.
Right arrow Articles by Di Chiro, G.

Radiology, Vol 177, 39-44, Copyright © 1990 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Pituitary microadenomas: a PET study

B De Souza, A Brunetti, MJ Fulham, RA Brooks, D DeMichele, P Cook, L Nieman, JL Doppman, EH Oldfield and G Di Chiro
Neuroimaging Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

Twenty cases of surgically verified pituitary microadenoma (17 with Cushing disease and three with acromegaly) were studied with positron emission tomography (PET) with use of fluorine-18-2-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). The diagnostic results were compared with those of other modalities, namely, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and, in the cases of Cushing disease, simultaneous bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (SIPS). The PET results showed 12 positive readings and one questionable reading, compared with seven positive readings and one questionable reading for CT (18 cases studied) and 13 positive and two questionable MR imaging readings. PET complemented MR imaging, in the sense that five of the positive PET readings were negative or questionable at MR imaging. PET studies of 20 healthy control subjects showed no false-positive cases, whereas other studies of healthy subjects with contrast material-enhanced CT and MR imaging have yielded, respectively, 20% and 15% positive readings, with findings suggestive of silent or occult adenomas.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
D.J. Cross, J.A. Flexman, Y. Anzai, T. Sasaki, P.M. Treuting, K.R. Maravilla, and S. Minoshima
In Vivo Manganese MR Imaging of Calcium Influx in Spontaneous Rat Pituitary Adenoma
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2007; 28(10): 1865 - 1871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
N Aide, M Benayoun, K Kerrou, A Khalil, J Cadranel, and J N Talbot
Impact of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]-FDG) imaging in sarcoidosis: unsuspected neurosarcoidosis discovered by [18F]-FDG PET and early metabolic response to corticosteroid therapy
Br. J. Radiol., March 1, 2007; 80(951): e67 - e71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1990 by the Radiological Society of North America.