Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacMahon, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yonekawa, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacMahon, H.
Right arrow Articles by Yonekawa, H.

Radiology, Vol 178, 175-179, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography

H MacMahon, K Doi, S Sanada, SM Montner, ML Giger, CE Metz, N Nakamori, FF Yin, XW Xu and H Yonekawa
Kurt Rossmann Laboratories for Radiologic Image Research, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, IL 60637.

High-resolution digital images make up very large data sets that are relatively slow to transmit and expensive to store. Data compression techniques are being developed to address this problem, but significant image deterioration can occur at high compression ratios. In this study, the authors evaluated a form of adaptive block cosine transform coding, a new compression technique that allows considerable compression of digital radiographs with minimal degradation of image quality. To determine the effect of data compression on diagnostic accuracy, observer tests were performed with 60 digitized chest radiographs (2,048 x 2,048 matrix, 1,024 shades of gray) containing subtle examples of pneumothorax, interstitial infiltrate, nodules, and bone lesions. Radiographs with no compression, with 25:1 compression, and with 50:1 compression ratios were presented in randomized order to 12 radiologists. The results suggest that, with this compression scheme, compression ratios as high as 25:1 may be acceptable for primary diagnosis in chest radiology.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
K. Sayinsu, F. Isik, G. Trakyali, and T. Arun
An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings
Eur J Orthod, February 1, 2007; 29(1): 105 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. M. Slone, E. Muka, and T. K. Pilgram
Irreversible JPEG Compression of Digital Chest Radiographs for Primary Interpretation: Assessment of Visually Lossless Threshold
Radiology, August 1, 2003; 228(2): 425 - 429.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. P. Ko, H. Rusinek, D. P. Naidich, G. McGuinness, A. N. Rubinowitz, B. S. Leitman, and J. M. Martino
Wavelet Compression of Low-Dose Chest CT Data: Effect on Lung Nodule Detection
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 70 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Ohgiya, T. Gokan, H. Nobusawa, M. Hirose, N. Seino, H. Fujisawa, M. Baba, K. Nagai, K. Tanno, N. Takeyama, et al.
Acute Cerebral Infarction: Effect of JPEG Compression on Detection at CT
Radiology, April 1, 2003; 227(1): 124 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Kalyanpur, V. P. Neklesa, C. R. Taylor, A. R. Daftary, and J. A. Brink
Evaluation of JPEG and Wavelet Compression of Body CT Images for Direct Digital Teleradiologic Transmission
Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 772 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. F. Good, J. H. Sumkin, M. Ganott, L. Hardesty, B. Holbert, C. M. Johns, and A. H. Klym
Detection of Masses and Clustered Microcalcifications on Data Compressed Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2000; 175(6): 1573 - 1576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. M. Goo, J.-G. Im, J. H. Kim, J. B. Seo, T. S. Kim, S. J. Shine, and W. Lee
Digital Chest Radiography with a Selenium-Based Flat-Panel Detector Versus a Storage Phosphor System: Comparison of Soft-Copy Images
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2000; 175(4): 1013 - 1018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. M. Slone, D. H. Foos, B. R. Whiting, E. Muka, D. A. Rubin, T. K. Pilgram, K. S. Kohm, S. S. Young, P. Ho, and D. D. Hendrickson
Assessment of Visually Lossless Irreversible Image Compression: Comparison of Three Methods by Using an Image-Comparison Workstation
Radiology, May 1, 2000; 215(2): 543 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.