Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kagetsu, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Litt, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kagetsu, N. J.
Right arrow Articles by Litt, A. W.

Radiology, Vol 179, 505-508, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Important considerations in measurement of attractive force on metallic implants in MR imagers

NJ Kagetsu and AW Litt
Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016.

Almost all reported measurements of the attractive force exerted on metallic implants in magnetic fields of magnetic resonance imagers have been obtained at the portal. This study was done to determine whether the maximum force on an implant is at the portal. Horizontal attractive forces on needles were measured along the axis of the bore at various distances from the portal of a 0.3-T vertical-field magnet and 0.5- and 1.5-T solenoid magnets. Upward vertical forces along the top of the bore were also measured. The horizontal forces 40 cm in from the portals of the 0.5- and 1.5-T magnets were 70%-80% greater than the horizontal forces at the portal. The upward vertical force at the top of the 0.3-T magnet bore, 63 cm in from the portal, was 20 times the horizontal force at the portal and was twice the maximum force measured in the 0.5-T magnet. The maximum force was not at the portal.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. R. Patel, T. S. E. Albert, D. E. Kandzari, E. F. Honeycutt, L. K. Shaw, M. H. Sketch Jr, M. D. Elliott, R. M. Judd, and R. J. Kim
Acute Myocardial Infarction: Safety of Cardiac MR Imaging after Percutaneous Revascularization with Stents
Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 674 - 680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. T. Hennemeyer, K. Wicklow, D. A. Feinberg, and C. P. Derdeyn
In Vitro Evaluation of Platinum Guglielmi Detachable Coils at 3 T with a Porcine Model: Safety Issues and Artifacts
Radiology, June 1, 2001; 219(3): 732 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
E. Kanal and F. G. Shellock
Aneurysm Clips: Effects of Long-term and Multiple Exposures to a 1.5-T MR System
Radiology, February 1, 1999; 210(2): 563 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.