Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Silvers, R. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turner, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Silvers, R. I.

Radiology, Vol 179, 629-633, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Truncation artifact: a potential pitfall in MR imaging of the menisci of the knee

DA Turner, MI Rapoport, WD Erwin, M McGould and RI Silvers
Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 60612.

Because truncation artifacts on magnetic resonance (MR) images may be confused with meniscal tears, measures to suppress them were investigated in a human cadaver knee and prospective and retrospective studies of patients. The artifacts were most prominent when the acquisition matrix was 128 x 256 and the 128-pixel (phase-encoded) axis was in a superoinferior (SI) orientation. An anteroposterior (AP) orientation of the 128-pixel axis or use of a 256 x 256 acquisition matrix reduced the prominence of or nearly eliminated the artifacts. A review of reports of MR imaging and arthroscopic examinations of 83 knees yielded eight menisci that were falsely interpreted at MR imaging as having tears. Retrospective review of the images suggested that the errors were due to truncation artifacts in two cases. Truncation artifacts will cause relatively little difficulty if diagnostic observers are aware of their characteristics and simple steps are taken to minimize their prominence, including acquiring images in 192 x 256 or 256 x 256 matrices or AP rather than SI orientation of the phase- encoded (128-pixel) axis of 128 x 256 matrices.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. W. A. Pfirrmann, S. R. Duc, M. Zanetti, C. Dora, and J. Hodler
MR Arthrography of Acetabular Cartilage Delamination in Femoroacetabular Cam Impingement
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 236 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.