Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Kaufman, L.

Radiology, Vol 180, 123-125, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Impact of section doubling on lesion contrast

PE Sheldon, PA Rothschild, DM Kramer, JD Hale and L Kaufman
Radiologic Imaging Laboratory, University of California, San Francisco 94080.

Misregistration between section position and a feature of interest, such as a lesion, can result in loss of contrast on magnetic resonance images. Because the section direction typically has the poorest resolution, reduction of section misregistration can improve lesion contrast. Lesions occur at random sites; hence, to reduce misregistration, it is necessary to repeat imaging with a small amount of offset. This is impractical. Therefore, a reconstruction algorithm that yields offset sections was implemented, in which sections were produced with a zero- and a half-section shift. This algorithm was tested in 14 patients with multiple sclerosis. As expected, because of randomness associated with section placement relative to lesions, the half-shifted sections provided greater contrast as often as the zero- shifted sections. The combined set improved contrast significantly in 39% of lesions; improvement was greatest in lesions with lesser contrast. Signal-to-noise ratios were not affected by this process, which appears to be useful in magnetic resonance image reconstruction.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.