Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathieu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vasile, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mathieu, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vasile, N.

Radiology, Vol 180, 25-30, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: assessment with contrast- enhanced TurboFLASH MR imaging

D Mathieu, A Rahmouni, MC Anglade, B Falise, C Beges, P Gheung, JJ Mollet and N Vasile
Department of Radiology, Hopital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France.

Twenty-two patients with 25 cases of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) proved with pathologic study were imaged with a TurboFLASH (fast low angle shot) sequence combined with bolus administration of gadolinium tetraazacyclododecanetetraacetic acid (DOTA), spin-echo (SE) T2- weighted sequences, and postcontrast T1-weighted sequences. FNH-liver signal-difference-to-noise ratios were quantified; the features of the central scar were qualitatively analyzed. On SE T2-weighted images, all FNHs were hyperintense; in two cases the central scar exhibited a high signal intensity associated with hypointense areas corresponding to fibrous tissue within the branches of the scar. Unenhanced TurboFLASH images always demonstrated the FNHs as hypointense and always depicted the central scar as a hypointense area within the lesion. After bolus injection, arterial enhancement of FNH was clearly seen, and in 10 of 25 lesions, enhancement within the scar was seen 40-80 seconds after injection. Both unenhanced and enhanced TurboFLASH sequences produced the best signal-difference-to-noise ratios in comparison with T2- weighted images.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. Ferlicot, H. Kobeiter, J. T. Van Nhieu, D. Cherqui, D. Dhumeaux, D. Mathieu, and E. S. Zafrani
MRI of Atypical Focal Nodular Hyperplasia of the Liver: Radiology-Pathology Correlation
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1227 - 1231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. Ba-Ssalamah, W. Schima, M. T. Schmook, K. F. Linnau, N. Schibany, T. Helbich, P. Reimer, F. Laengle, F. Wrba, A. Kurtaran, et al.
Atypical Focal Nodular Hyperplasia of the Liver: Imaging Features of Nonspecific and Liver-Specific MR Contrast Agents
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2002; 179(6): 1447 - 1456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
A Luciani, H Kobeiter, P Maison, D Cherqui, E-S Zafrani, D Dhumeaux, and D Mathieu
Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver in men: is presentation the same in men and women?
Gut, June 1, 2002; 50(6): 877 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. C. Semelka and T. K. G. Helmberger
Contrast Agents for MR Imaging of the Liver
Radiology, January 1, 2001; 218(1): 27 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Grazioli, G. Morana, M. P. Federle, G. Brancatelli, M. Testoni, M. A. Kirchin, K. Menni, L. Olivetti, N. Nicoli, and C. Procacci
Focal Nodular Hyperplasia: Morphologic and Functional Information from MR Imaging with Gadobenate Dimeglumine
Radiology, December 1, 2001; 221(3): 731 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.