Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yuh, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrhardt, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yuh, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Ehrhardt, J. C.

Radiology, Vol 180, 485-491, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

MR evaluation of CNS tumors: dose comparison study with gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoteridol

WT Yuh, DJ Fisher, JD Engelken, GM Greene, Y Sato, TJ Ryals, MR Crain and JC Ehrhardt
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.

In phase II and III trials of gadoteridol (Gd-HP-D03A), a new nonionic, low-osmolar contrast agent, 40 patients with intracranial neoplasms underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with experimental doses of 0.05-0.3 mmol/kg. Fifteen patients also underwent contrast studies with the standard dose (0.1 mmol/kg) of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Both gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadoteridol appear to have a similar effect when given in equal doses (0.1 mmol/kg, n = 5). Lesion enhancement and delineation were better at higher experimental doses (0.2 or 0.3 mmol/kg, n = 7) and worse at a lower experimental dose (0.05 mmol/kg, n = 3). Quantitative analysis of 10 lesions examined with identical imaging protocols revealed a directly proportional relationship (r = .975) between lesion contrast ratio and dose over a range of 0.05-0.3 mmol/kg. Phantom experiments support the clinical results. Improved enhancement, detection, and delineation of central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms resulting from increased injected doses of gadoteridol have the potential to be clinically significant and may justify the possibly higher cost of increased contrast material dosage. Lower doses may not be adequate for the evaluation of most CNS tumors.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H.A. Rowley, G. Scialfa, P.-y. Gao, J.A. Maldjian, D. Hassell, M.J. Kuhn, F.J. Wippold II, M. Gallucci, B.C. Bowen, I.M. Schmalfuss, et al.
Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging of Brain Lesions: A Large-Scale Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine versus Gadodiamide
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1684 - 1691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. R. Maravilla, J. A. Maldjian, I. M. Schmalfuss, M. J. Kuhn, B. C. Bowen, F. J. Wippold II, V. M. Runge, M. V. Knopp, S. Kremer, L. J. Wolansky, et al.
Contrast Enhancement of Central Nervous System Lesions: Multicenter Intraindividual Crossover Comparative Study of Two MR Contrast Agents
Radiology, August 1, 2006; 240(2): 389 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. V. Knopp, V. M. Runge, M. Essig, M. Hartman, O. Jansen, M. A. Kirchin, A. Moeller, A. H. Seeberg, and K.-P. Lodemann
Primary and Secondary Brain Tumors at MR Imaging: Bicentric Intraindividual Crossover Comparison of Gadobenate Dimeglumine and Gadopentetate Dimeglumine
Radiology, January 1, 2004; 230(1): 55 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Breslau, J. G. Jarvik, D. R. Haynor, W. T. Longstreth Jr, D. L. Kent, and K. R. Maravilla
MR Contrast Media in Neuroimaging: A Critical Review of the Literature
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 1999; 20(4): 670 - 675.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.