Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sistrom, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Peffley, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sistrom, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Peffley, L.

Radiology, Vol 180, 707-710, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Extravasation of iopamidol and iohexol during contrast-enhanced CT: report of 28 cases

CL Sistrom, SB Gay and L Peffley
Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22908.

Extravasation of intravenously injected contrast medium is a well-known complication of radiologic procedures. Records from a 27-month period were reviewed of 28 patients in whom extravasation of nonionic contrast medium occurred during computed tomographic (CT) scanning. Extravasated amounts ranged from 3 mL in an infant to 100 mL in an adult. There were seven documented major (50-100-mL) events and nine documented moderate (10-49-mL) events. Follow-up showed that none of these patients required medical or surgical intervention as a result of extravasation. The rate of extravasation during neurologic CT scanning (head, orbits, and spine) was 0.09%, while the rate for the rest of the body (chest, abdomen, pelvis, neck) was 0.17%; the overall rate was 0.14%. The higher rate for non-neurologic studies was related to the use of a power injector. Nonionic contrast medium seemed to cause fewer systemic reactions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. C. Weinreb
Which Study When? Is Gadolinium-enhanced MR Imaging Safer than Iodine-enhanced CT?
Radiology, October 1, 2008; 249(1): 3 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. L. Wang, R. H. Cohan, J. H. Ellis, S. Adusumilli, and N. R. Dunnick
Frequency, Management, and Outcome of Extravasation of Nonionic Iodinated Contrast Medium in 69 657 Intravenous Injections
Radiology, April 1, 2007; 243(1): 80 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. G. Amaral, J. Traubici, G. BenDavid, G. Reintamm, and A. Daneman
Safety of power injector use in children as measured by incidence of extravasation.
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2006; 187(2): 580 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. C. Sanelli, M. Deshmukh, I. Ougorets, R. Caiati, and L. A. Heier
Safety and Feasibility of Using a Central Venous Catheter for Rapid Contrast Injection Rates
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1829 - 1834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
B. R. Herts, C. M. O'Malley, S. L. Wirth, M. L. Lieber, and B. Pohlman
Power Injection of Contrast Media Using Central Venous Catheters: Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 447 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. C. Powell, J. m. Li, L. Rodino, and F. A. Anderson
A New Device to Limit Extravasation During Contrast-Enhanced CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 315 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. A. Birnbaum, R. C. Nelson, J. L. Chezmar, and S. N. Glick
Extravasation Detection Accessory: Clinical Evaluation in 500 Patients
Radiology, August 1, 1999; 212(2): 431 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text]