Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okajima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Abe, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okajima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Abe, M.

Radiology, Vol 181, 273-276, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Quantitative assessment of quality of digitized portal images: receiver operating characteristic analysis applied to imaging in radiation therapy

K Okajima, M Nakata, S Yano, Y Nagata, I Kimura, Y Nakano and M Abe
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.

An objective and quantitative method for the evaluation of the quality of megavoltage portal images was developed by applying receiver operating characteristic analysis. On the basis of therapeutic use of portal images, setup errors were employed as "signals" in this experimental study that compared the original portal films with digitized images. Six readers observed 104 portal images of a chest phantom, half of which were "abnormal" (ie, had setup errors). Digital images (2,048 x 2,048 matrix) were enhanced by means of histogram equalization and then printed with a laser printer for observation. The readers showed a higher discrimination capacity with the digitally enhanced images, although a statistically significant improvement was not demonstrated. The present method of assessment of image quality proved to be both simple and clinically reasonable.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.