Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Watt, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Watt, D. L.

Radiology, Vol 181, 355-357, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Measurement of force applied during mammography

DC Sullivan, CA Beam, SM Goodman and DL Watt
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

The discomfort that patients experience during mammography is probably related to a variety of factors, one of which might be the amount of compression used. The authors measured the amount of force applied to the breasts during mammography and the resulting breast thickness in 560 women and correlated these measurements with the patient's subjective impression of the examination. The amount of force applied ranged from 49 to 186.2 N (median, 122.5 N). Breast thickness ranged from 10 to 88 mm (median, 46.5 mm). Forty-seven women (8%) rated the examination as painful (ie, mammography was either "very uncomfortable" or "intolerable"). Logistic regression analysis revealed a highly significant relationship between probability of a painful response and ratio of force to thickness (P = .007). Current guidelines suggest that maximum available force be at least 160 N but not more than 200 N. However, because increasing force is associated with increasing likelihood of pain, technologists should be aware that these recommended maximum limits are not intended to be used routinely for all women. In this study, high-quality mammograms were obtained in a majority of women with forces less than the maximum available level.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. R. Dullum, E. C. Lewis, and J. A. Mayer
Rates and Correlates of Discomfort Associated with Mammography
Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 547 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1991 by the Radiological Society of North America.