|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 181, 449-453, Copyright © 1991 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
S Saini, W Li, B Wallner, PF Hahn and RR Edelman
Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
The authors evaluated soft-tissue contrast on spin-echo (SE) proton density-weighted, SE T2-weighted, SE short-echo-time (TE) T1-weighted, and gradient-echo (GRE) images of 34 patients with known hepatic tumors who underwent high-field-strength (1.5-T) magnetic resonance imaging. For solid liver tumors, the difference in the mean lesion-liver contrast-to-noise ratios (C/Ns) with T1- (GRE and SE) and T2-weighted pulse sequences was not statistically significant (P greater than .05). For nonsolid liver tumors, the T2-weighted images provided significantly greater (P less than .05) mean lesion-liver C/N than T1- weighted GRE images. Mean liver signal-to-noise ratio was significantly greater on T1-weighted GRE (P less than .0001) and T1-weighted SE (P less than .05) images than on T2- and proton density-weighted images. Qualitative analysis of T1-weighted (SE and GRE) images and proton density- plus T2-weighted images showed that lesion conspicuity was similar in 25 of 32 patients (78%). The results suggest that liver tumor imaging at high field strength can be performed with short-TE T1- weighted (SE or GRE) or conventional T2-weighted pulse sequences.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. T. Sica, H. Ji, and P. R. Ros CT and MR Imaging of Hepatic Metastases Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2000; 174(3): 691 - 698. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |