Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boden, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wiesel, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boden, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Wiesel, S. W.

Radiology, Vol 182, 59-64, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Contrast-enhanced MR imaging performed after successful lumbar disk surgery: prospective study

SD Boden, DO Davis, TS Dina, CP Parker, S O'Malley, JL Sunner and SW Wiesel
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20037.

A prospective study was undertaken to establish the normal spectrum and timing of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings in 15 patients who had resolution of symptoms after successful lumbar disk surgery. Enhancement of the facet joints (in 88% of disk levels) and paraspinal muscles (100%) decreased gradually after surgery. Enhancement of the decompressed nerve root tracked proximally toward the conus medullaris in 62% at 3 weeks and was absent in all by 6 months postoperatively. Areas of intermediate signal intensity with peripheral enhancement and mass effect were seen on T1-weighted images at the site of the original disk herniation in 38% at 3 weeks and 12% at 3 months, despite complete relief of leg pain. These results reveal that even in successfully treated (asymptomatic) patients, residual mass effect on the neural elements may frequently simulate a recurrent or residual disk fragment. There is an orderly progression of imaging changes during the first 6 months after lumbar surgery that limits the interpretation of MR examinations during that period.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. N. Brant-Zawadzki, S. C. Dennis, G. F. Gade, and M. P. Weinstein
Low Back Pain
Radiology, November 1, 2000; 217(2): 321 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. D. BODEN
Current Concepts Review - The Use of Radiographic Imaging Studies in the Evaluation of Patients Who Have Degenerative Disorders of the Lumbar Spine
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 1996; 78(1): 114 - 24.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.