|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 182, 649-655, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
RD Moore, EP Steinberg, NR Powe, JA Brinker, EK Fishman, S Graziano and R Gopalan
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.
The comparative frequency of and risk factors for nephrotoxicity with low-osmolality contrast medium (LOM) versus high-osmolality contrast medium (HOM) were investigated. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in patients undergoing diagnostic angiocardiography (n = 430) or contrast material-enhanced body computed tomography (CT) (n = 499). Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level that was greater than both 33% and 0.4 mg/dL (40 mumols/L) above the baseline level within 48 hours after the radiologic procedure. The frequency of nephrotoxicity was similar in patients who received LOM versus those who received HOM: 13 of 479 (2.7%) versus 13 of 450 (2.9%), respectively (P = .87), overall; 4.4% versus 4.0% in angiocardiography patients (P = .84); and 1.2% versus 2.0% in body CT patients (P = .35). Factors associated (P less than .05) with increased risk of nephrotoxicity were insulin-dependent diabetes, baseline serum creatinine level greater than 1.5 mg/dL (130 mumols/L), concurrent use of furosemide, and angiocardiographic examination. Patients who have preexisting renal insufficiency may be at higher risk for nephrotoxicity with HOM than with LOM.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. S. Brar, A. Y.-J. Shen, M. B. Jorgensen, A. Kotlewski, V. J. Aharonian, N. Desai, M. Ree, A. I. Shah, and R. J. Burchette Sodium Bicarbonate vs Sodium Chloride for the Prevention of Contrast Medium-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Trial JAMA, September 3, 2008; 300(9): 1038 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Newhouse, D. Kho, Q. A. Rao, and J. Starren Frequency of Serum Creatinine Changes in the Absence of Iodinated Contrast Material: Implications for Studies of Contrast Nephrotoxicity Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 376 - 382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. McCullough Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 15, 2008; 51(15): 1419 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. Katzberg and B. J. Barrett Risk of Iodinated Contrast Material-induced Nephropathy with Intravenous Administration Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 622 - 628. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Dussol, S. Morange, A. Loundoun, P. Auquier, and Y. Berland A randomized trial of saline hydration to prevent contrast nephropathy in chronic renal failure patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2120 - 2126. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Pannu, N. Wiebe, M. Tonelli, and for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network Prophylaxis Strategies for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy JAMA, June 21, 2006; 295(23): 2765 - 2779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. A. Rao and J. H. Newhouse Risk of Nephropathy after Intravenous Administration of Contrast Material: A Critical Literature Analysis Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 392 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tepel, P. Aspelin, and N. Lameire Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Clinical and Evidence-Based Approach Circulation, April 11, 2006; 113(14): 1799 - 1806. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Goldenberg and S. Matetzky Nephropathy induced by contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors and preventive strategies Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 24, 2005; 172(11): 1461 - 1471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Gleeson and S. Bulugahapitiya Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1673 - 1689. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. Gami and V. D. Garovic Contrast Nephropathy After Coronary Angiography Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2004; 79(2): 211 - 219. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Thompson and S. L. King Acetylcysteine and Fenoldopam: Promising New Approaches for Preventing Effects of Contrast Nephrotoxicity Crit. Care Nurse, June 1, 2003; 23(3): 39 - 46. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Kay, W. H. Chow, T. M. Chan, S. K. Lo, O. H. Kwok, A. Yip, K. Fan, C. H. Lee, and W. F. Lam Acetylcysteine for Prevention of Acute Deterioration of Renal Function Following Elective Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, February 5, 2003; 289(5): 553 - 558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kapoor, S. Kumar, S. Gulati, S. Gambhir, R. S. Sethi, and N. Sinha The role of theophylline in contrast-induced nephropathy: a case-control study Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 1936 - 1941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |