Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gopalan, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Gopalan, R.

Radiology, Vol 182, 649-655, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Nephrotoxicity of high-osmolality versus low-osmolality contrast media: randomized clinical trial

RD Moore, EP Steinberg, NR Powe, JA Brinker, EK Fishman, S Graziano and R Gopalan
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205.

The comparative frequency of and risk factors for nephrotoxicity with low-osmolality contrast medium (LOM) versus high-osmolality contrast medium (HOM) were investigated. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in patients undergoing diagnostic angiocardiography (n = 430) or contrast material-enhanced body computed tomography (CT) (n = 499). Nephrotoxicity was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level that was greater than both 33% and 0.4 mg/dL (40 mumols/L) above the baseline level within 48 hours after the radiologic procedure. The frequency of nephrotoxicity was similar in patients who received LOM versus those who received HOM: 13 of 479 (2.7%) versus 13 of 450 (2.9%), respectively (P = .87), overall; 4.4% versus 4.0% in angiocardiography patients (P = .84); and 1.2% versus 2.0% in body CT patients (P = .35). Factors associated (P less than .05) with increased risk of nephrotoxicity were insulin-dependent diabetes, baseline serum creatinine level greater than 1.5 mg/dL (130 mumols/L), concurrent use of furosemide, and angiocardiographic examination. Patients who have preexisting renal insufficiency may be at higher risk for nephrotoxicity with HOM than with LOM.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. S. Brar, A. Y.-J. Shen, M. B. Jorgensen, A. Kotlewski, V. J. Aharonian, N. Desai, M. Ree, A. I. Shah, and R. J. Burchette
Sodium Bicarbonate vs Sodium Chloride for the Prevention of Contrast Medium-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Trial
JAMA, September 3, 2008; 300(9): 1038 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Newhouse, D. Kho, Q. A. Rao, and J. Starren
Frequency of Serum Creatinine Changes in the Absence of Iodinated Contrast Material: Implications for Studies of Contrast Nephrotoxicity
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 376 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. A. McCullough
Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 15, 2008; 51(15): 1419 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. W. Katzberg and B. J. Barrett
Risk of Iodinated Contrast Material-induced Nephropathy with Intravenous Administration
Radiology, June 1, 2007; 243(3): 622 - 628.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Dussol, S. Morange, A. Loundoun, P. Auquier, and Y. Berland
A randomized trial of saline hydration to prevent contrast nephropathy in chronic renal failure patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2120 - 2126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
N. Pannu, N. Wiebe, M. Tonelli, and for the Alberta Kidney Disease Network
Prophylaxis Strategies for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
JAMA, June 21, 2006; 295(23): 2765 - 2779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Q. A. Rao and J. H. Newhouse
Risk of Nephropathy after Intravenous Administration of Contrast Material: A Critical Literature Analysis
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 392 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Tepel, P. Aspelin, and N. Lameire
Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Clinical and Evidence-Based Approach
Circulation, April 11, 2006; 113(14): 1799 - 1806.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
I. Goldenberg and S. Matetzky
Nephropathy induced by contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors and preventive strategies
Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 24, 2005; 172(11): 1461 - 1471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. G. Gleeson and S. Bulugahapitiya
Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2004; 183(6): 1673 - 1689.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin. Proc.Home page
A. S. Gami and V. D. Garovic
Contrast Nephropathy After Coronary Angiography
Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2004; 79(2): 211 - 219.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crit Care NurseHome page
E. J. Thompson and S. L. King
Acetylcysteine and Fenoldopam: Promising New Approaches for Preventing Effects of Contrast Nephrotoxicity
Crit. Care Nurse, June 1, 2003; 23(3): 39 - 46.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. Kay, W. H. Chow, T. M. Chan, S. K. Lo, O. H. Kwok, A. Yip, K. Fan, C. H. Lee, and W. F. Lam
Acetylcysteine for Prevention of Acute Deterioration of Renal Function Following Elective Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, February 5, 2003; 289(5): 553 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Kapoor, S. Kumar, S. Gulati, S. Gambhir, R. S. Sethi, and N. Sinha
The role of theophylline in contrast-induced nephropathy: a case-control study
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 1936 - 1941.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.