Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Libshitz, H. I.
Right arrow Articles by Husband, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Libshitz, H. I.
Right arrow Articles by Husband, J. E.

Radiology, Vol 182, 833-837, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Multiple myeloma: appearance at MR imaging

HI Libshitz, SR Malthouse, D Cunningham, AD MacVicar and JE Husband
Department of Radiology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, England.

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examinations of the lumbar spine and clinical and laboratory findings in 32 patients with multiple myeloma were reviewed. On T1-weighted images, signal intensity (SI) of the vertebrae approximated that of muscle in 14 cases and was intermediate (between the SIs of muscle and fat) in 18. Definite foci of decreased SI were seen in eight cases (25%), and foci of increased SI, representing fatty infiltration, were seen in 12 (38%). On T2-weighted images, SI approximated that of muscle in 17 cases and was intermediate in 15. Definite foci of increased SI were seen in 17 (53%). Of 38 vertebral compression fractures (including 18 in nine additional patients), foci of abnormal SI consistent with tumor on either T1- or T2-weighted images were seen in 19 cases (50%). There was no correlation between MR imaging findings and laboratory or bone marrow findings. Foci of presumed tumor were better or exclusively shown on T2- weighted images in 11 of 17 patients (65%) with identifiable focal disease. Other suggestions of multiple myeloma on T1-weighted images may be the absence of fatty replacement or a generalized decrease in SI.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
M HORGER, P PEREIRA, C D CLAUSSEN, L KANZ, R VONTHEIN, B DENECKE, and C DRIESSEN
Hyperattenuating bone marrow abnormalities in myeloma patients using whole-body non-enhanced low-dose MDCT: correlation with haematological parameters
Br. J. Radiol., May 1, 2008; 81(965): 386 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.J. Johnson, J. Ying, T. El Gammal, R.D. Timmerman, R.Y. Kim, and B. Littenberg
Which MR Imaging Sequences Are Necessary in Determining the Need for Radiation Therapy for Cord Compression? A Prospective Study
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
U. Tateishi, G. W. Gladish, M. Kusumoto, T. Hasegawa, R. Yokoyama, R. Tsuchiya, and N. Moriyama
Chest Wall Tumors: Radiologic Findings and Pathologic Correlation: Part 2. Malignant Tumors
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1491 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. H. Mahnken, J. E. Wildberger, G. Gehbauer, T. Schmitz-Rode, M. Blaum, U. Fabry, and R. W. Gunther
Multidetector CT of the Spine in Multiple Myeloma: Comparison with MR Imaging and Radiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1429 - 1436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. A. Moulopoulos and M. A. Dimopoulos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Bone Marrow in Hematologic Malignancies
Blood, September 15, 1997; 90(6): 2127 - 2147.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.