Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Choyke, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Choyke, P. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, S. A.

Radiology, Vol 183, 111-114, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Delayed reactions to contrast media after interleukin-2 immunotherapy

PL Choyke, DL Miller, MT Lotze, JM Whiteis, B Ebbitt and SA Rosenberg
Diagnostic Radiology Department, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

A prospective study was conducted by means of a questionnaire to determine the prevalence of delayed reactions to contrast media administered intravenously (iopamidol) and orally (diatrizoate sodium) in 170 patients who had received interleukin-2 (IL-2) and in 631 patients who did not. Another control group of 100 non-IL-2 patients received only oral contrast medium. Delayed reactions (eg, fever rash, flulike symptoms, joint pain, flushing, pruritus, and dizziness) were reported in 3.9% (25 of 631) of non-IL-2 patients and in 11.8% (20 of 170) of IL-2 patients. Reactions were mild in the non-IL-2 patients but were more severe in the IL-2 patients. Two IL-2 patients required hospitalization. Only rash, flulike symptoms, and pruritus were statistically more common in IL-2 patients than in non-IL-2 patients. The prevalence of delayed reactions to nonionic contrast medium is higher in patients who have received IL-2 than in the general population. Most delayed reactions do not require therapy, but, when necessary, therapy is usually limited to relief of symptoms.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nucl. Med. Technol.Home page
J. Singh and A. Daftary
Iodinated Contrast Media and Their Adverse Reactions
J. Nucl. Med. Technol., June 1, 2008; 36(2): 69 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S K Morcos
Acute serious and fatal reactions to contrast media: our current understanding
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2005; 78(932): 686 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.