Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mueller, P. R.

Radiology, Vol 183, 171-174, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Acute complicated pancreatitis: redefining the role of interventional radiology

MJ Lee, DW Rattner, DA Legemate, S Saini, SL Dawson, PF Hahn, AL Warshaw and PR Mueller
Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114.

Computed tomographic (CT) scans in 30 patients who had undergone percutaneous drainage for acute complicated pancreatitis were retrospectively studied to determine the role of percutaneous drainage. Fifty-nine collections were percutaneously drained in these 30 patients. Eighty-one catheters were placed in the 59 collections (average, 1.4 catheters per patient). Patients required an average of three catheter manipulations, seven abdominal CT scans, 5 weeks of catheter drainage, a mean hospital stay of 82 days (range, 42-122 days), and a mean intensive care unit stay of 31 days (range, 1-62 days). Percutaneous intervention was successful in 14 patients, partially successful in four, and unsuccessful in eight. A temporizing effect was seen in four patients. Percutaneous intervention was successful in one of 10 central (pancreas and lesser sac areas) collections and 28 of 49 peripheral collections. Surgical debridement was necessary in 16 patients because of failed or incomplete percutaneous drainage. Complications occurred in five patients, and the mortality rate was 33%. Drainage of central areas should initially be performed by a surgeon, while peripheral collections should be drained percutaneously as they develop.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. Lecesne, P. Taourel, P. M. Bret, M. Atri, and C. Reinhold
Acute Pancreatitis: Interobserver Agreement and Correlation of CT and MR Cholangiopancreatography with Outcome
Radiology, June 1, 1999; 211(3): 727 - 735.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.