Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wachsberg, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, A. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wachsberg, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, A. B.

Radiology, Vol 183, 431-433, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Gas within the endometrial cavity at postpartum US: a normal finding after spontaneous vaginal delivery

RH Wachsberg and AB Kurtz
Department of Radiology, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia.

In the puerperium, the detection of gas within the endometrial cavity at ultrasound (US) has been commonly taken to indicate endometritis. Of 70 clinically healthy women in whom US was performed after uncomplicated spontaneous vaginal delivery, 13 (19%) had evidence of gas in the endometrial cavity within the first 3 postpartum days (mean, 37 hours; range, 25-59 hours) and five (7%) had such evidence in the 3rd week after delivery (mean, 2.4 weeks; range, 2.1-2.9 weeks). Gas was seen in the endometrial cavity on at least one occasion during the first 3 postpartum weeks in 15 (21%) of these apparently healthy women; in no case did clinical evidence of endometritis develop. From these observations, the authors believe that gas detected within the endometrial cavity is not, in and of itself, suggestive of endometritis, and that such a finding should be considered normal, at least until the end of the 3rd postpartum week.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. M. Durfee, M. C. Frates, A. Luong, and C. B. Benson
The Sonographic and Color Doppler Features of Retained Products of Conception
J. Ultrasound Med., September 1, 2005; 24(9): 1181 - 1186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
G. L. Bennett, C. M. Slywotzky, and G. Giovanniello
Gynecologic Causes of Acute Pelvic Pain: Spectrum of CT Findings
RadioGraphics, July 1, 2002; 22(4): 785 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
K. M. Nalaboff, J. S. Pellerito, and E. Ben-Levi
Imaging the Endometrium: Disease and Normal Variants
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2001; 21(6): 1409 - 1424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.