Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gavant, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Siegle, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gavant, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Siegle, R. L.

Radiology, Vol 183, 515-518, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Iodixanol in excretory urography: initial clinical experience with a nonionic, dimeric (ratio 6:1) contrast medium. Work in progress

ML Gavant and RL Siegle
Department of Radiology, University of Tennessee-Memphis, College of Medicine 38163.

The authors report the first clinical experience in the United States with the highly water soluble, nonionic dimer (6:1 ratio) contrast medium iodixanol (5,5'-[(2-hydroxyl-1,3- propanediyl)bis(acetylimino)]bis[N,N' - bis(2,3dihydroxypropyl)-2,4,6- triodo1,3-benzenedicarbooxa mide]). Iodixanol has an osmolality less than half that of monomeric, nonionic equivalent contrast media. Sodium, calcium, and magnesium ions were added to iodixanol to make the injected solution isosmotic to blood (290 mosm/kg H2O), with levels of free calcium and magnesium equivalent to levels found in the blood. Forty patients undergoing elective excretory urography were studied after bolus injection of doses of iodixanol with either 27 or 32 g of iodine. No adverse event or idiosyncratic reaction occurred. Seven patients felt coolness at the site of injection. Diagnostically adequate urographic examinations were routinely obtained with both doses. Further clinical investigation with iodixanol is warranted to determine if its beneficial chemical properties minimize both the chemotoxic and osmotoxic side effects and the disruption of physiologic functions that are seen with use of other ionic and nonionic contrast media.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.