|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 183, 643-647, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
RL Wahl, CA Henry and SP Ethier
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0028.
The positron-emitter-labeled glucose analogue 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2- deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) accumulates into many cancers after intravenous injection, but the effect of serum glucose levels on FDG uptake in the tumor has not been extensively studied. In vitro, elevated media glucose levels markedly diminished FDG and FDG 6-phosphate uptake and retention in human adenocarcinoma cells, while insulin had no effect. Mammary cancers were established subcutaneously in 12 rats. Six control rats with mammary tumors were fasted overnight. Hyperglycemia was established in six rats by means of continuous glucose infusion (glucose clamp). All animals were then intravenously administered 50 microCi of FDG. Serum glucose levels were 87 mg/dL (4.83 mmol/L) in the control animals and more than 900 mg/dL (49.9 mmol/L) in the hyperglycemic animals. One hour after injection of FDG, mean F-18 uptake in the tumor, brain, small bowel, and ovaries was 2.7-9.7 times lower in the hyperglycemic animals (P less than .02). Mean F-18 activity in the kidneys tended to be somewhat higher in the hyperglycemic animals. FDG uptake in other tissues was comparable between the control and hyperglycemic groups. These data suggest that high serum glucose levels may substantially impair visceral tumor imaging with FDG positron emission tomography.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Kumar, S. Basu, D. Torigian, V. Anand, H. Zhuang, and A. Alavi Role of Modern Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Infection in the Era of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2008; 21(1): 209 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Assadian, A. Aliaga, R. F. Del Maestro, A. C. Evans, and B. J. Bedell FDG-PET imaging for the evaluation of antiglioma agents in a rat model Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2008; 10(3): 292 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Tseng, K. W. Kang, M. Dandekar, S. Yaghoubi, J. H. Lee, J. G. Christensen, S. Muir, P. W. Vincent, N. R. Michaud, and S. S. Gambhir Preclinical Efficacy of the c-Met Inhibitor CE-355621 in a U87 MG Mouse Xenograft Model Evaluated by 18F-FDG Small-Animal PET J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 129 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dandekar, J. R. Tseng, and S. S. Gambhir Reproducibility of 18F-FDG microPET Studies in Mouse Tumor Xenografts J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 602 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. Schiffer, M. M. Mirrione, and S. L. Dewey Optimizing Experimental Protocols for Quantitative Behavioral Imaging with 18F-FDG in Rodents J. Nucl. Med., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 277 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Meller, C.-O. Sahlmann, and A. K. Scheel 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT in Fever of Unknown Origin J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 35 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Fueger, J. Czernin, I. Hildebrandt, C. Tran, B. S. Halpern, D. Stout, M. E. Phelps, and W. A. Weber Impact of Animal Handling on the Results of 18F-FDG PET Studies in Mice J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 999 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Shankar, J. M. Hoffman, S. Bacharach, M. M. Graham, J. Karp, A. A. Lammertsma, S. Larson, D. A. Mankoff, B. A. Siegel, A. Van den Abbeele, et al. Consensus Recommendations for the Use of 18F-FDG PET as an Indicator of Therapeutic Response in Patients in National Cancer Institute Trials J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1059 - 1066. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-y. O. Wong, J. Thie, K. J. Parling-Lynch, D. Zakalik, J. H. Margolis, M. Gaskill, J. Hill, F. Qing, D. Fink-Bennett, and C. Nagle Glucose-Normalized Standardized Uptake Value from 18F-FDG PET in Classifying Lymphomas J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2005; 46(10): 1659 - 1663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T.-C. Yen, K.-K. Ng, S.-Y. Ma, H.-H. Chou, C.-S. Tsai, S. Hsueh, T.-C. Chang, J.-H. Hong, L.-C. See, W.-J. Lin, et al. Value of Dual-Phase 2-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography in Cervical Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 21(19): 3651 - 3658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Vranjesevic, C. Schiepers, D. H. Silverman, A. Quon, J. Villalpando, M. Dahlbom, M. E. Phelps, and J. Czernin Relationship Between 18F-FDG Uptake and Breast Density in Women with Normal Breast Tissue J. Nucl. Med., August 1, 2003; 44(8): 1238 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Torizuka, T. Kanno, M. Futatsubashi, H. Okada, E. Yoshikawa, F. Nakamura, M. Takekuma, M. Maeda, and Y. Ouchi Imaging of Gynecologic Tumors: Comparison of 11C-Choline PET with 18F-FDG PET J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 1051 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Hoekstra, O. S. Hoekstra, S. G. Stroobants, J. Vansteenkiste, J. Nuyts, E. F. Smit, M. Boers, J. W.R. Twisk, and A. A. Lammertsma Methods to Monitor Response to Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with 18F-FDG PET J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2002; 43(10): 1304 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Greco, F. Crippa, R. Agresti, E. Seregni, A. Gerali, R. Giovanazzi, A. Micheli, S. Asero, C. Ferraris, M. Gennaro, et al. Axillary Lymph Node Staging in Breast Cancer by 2-Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-Positron Emission Tomography: Clinical Evaluation and Alternative Management J Natl Cancer Inst, April 18, 2001; 93(8): 630 - 635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. C. Smith, A. E. Welch, A. W. Hutcheon, I. D. Miller, S. Payne, F. Chilcott, S. Waikar, T. Whitaker, A. K. Ah-See, O. Eremin, et al. Positron Emission Tomography Using [18F]-Fluorodeoxy-D-Glucose to Predict the Pathologic Response of Breast Cancer to Primary Chemotherapy J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2000; 18(8): 1676 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sugawara, K. R. Zasadny, A. W. Neuhoff, and R. L. Wahl Reevaluation of the Standardized Uptake Value for FDG: Variations with Body Weight and Methods for Correction Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 521 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |