Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bansal, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sunshine, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bansal, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sunshine, J. H.

Radiology, Vol 183, 729-736, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Hospital and office practices of radiology groups

S Bansal and JH Sunshine
Department of Research, American College of Radiology, Reston, VA 22091.

To obtain information on the characteristics and practices of radiology groups in the United States, the American College of Radiology conducted a group practice survey in 1989; this report presents the main survey findings about the office and hospital practices of such groups. A questionnaire and one follow-up were mailed to all 2,591 radiology groups in the United States. Responses were weighted to reflect all groups. Hospital practices averaged 0.7 diagnostic radiologic procedures (including outpatient procedures) per patient day, with little variation by hospital type. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and angioplasty procedures were concentrated in teaching hospitals, but this was not true of other sophisticated procedures such as computed tomography and nuclear medicine. Offices averaged 15,000 diagnostic examinations annually, with less variation than expected according to group size. In both hospitals and offices, more than 90% of technologists were registered. Outsiders (most often, referring physicians and hospitals) had a financial interest in half of all offices. MR imaging and mammography grew faster than any other examinations, but only 44% of hospital practices accepted nonreferred patients for mammography.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
Y. S. Cypel and J. H. Sunshine
Basic Characteristics of Radiology Practices: Results from the American College of Radiology's 1999 Survey
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 341 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Sunshine, Y. S. Cypel, and B. Schepps
Diagnostic Radiologists in 2000: Basic Characteristics, Practices, and Issues Related to the Radiologist Shortage
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2002; 178(2): 291 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.