Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kline, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kline, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kline, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kline, T. S.

Radiology, Vol 184, 131-134, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Radiologists, communication, and Resolution 5: a medicolegal issue

TJ Kline and TS Kline
Department of Pathology, Lankenau Hospital, Wynnewood, PA 19096.

Resolution 5, adopted by the American College of Radiology, sets forth principles of direct communication that are important to every radiologist. This article reviews pertinent court decisions that affect radiologists and illustrates the importance of Resolution 5. In recent cases in state courts, liability standards have focused on four areas: negligence based on failure to personally inform clinicians of the diagnosis, ability of the jury to decide whether the radiologist's actions were appropriate, provision of information to the correct person, and necessity for expert testimony to define urgency. An important factor in liability cases appears to be the judgment of the radiologist in selection of the correct individual to receive the radiology report. The authors believe that electronic communication devices (eg, voice mail and fax machines) may potentially breach confidentiality and that such devices should therefore be used sparingly. Verbal communication by the radiologist to the referring physician, in addition to a written report, should avoid liability and improve quality of care for the patient.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
Communicating Findings of Radiologic Examinations: Whither Goest the Radiologist's Duty?
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2002; 178(4): 809 - 815.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
E. Coiera
Recent Advances: Medical informatics
BMJ, May 27, 1995; 310(6991): 1381 - 1387.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.