Radiology, Vol 184, 135-140, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Average radiation dose in standard CT examinations of the head: results of the 1990 NEXT survey

BJ Conway, JL McCrohan, RG Antonsen, FG Rueter, RJ Slayton and OH Suleiman
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD 20857.

In 1990, as part of the Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends (NEXT) program, 252 computed tomographic (CT) systems were evaluated to measure radiation doses associated with standard head CT in adults. The multiple-scan average dose (MSAD) was used as the dose descriptor. For most of the systems, the MSAD at the midpoint on the central axis of a standard dosimetry phantom was between 34 and 55 mGy. Doses were as high as 140 mGy, and dose sometimes varied by a factor of two or more for identical CT units. This range indicates that dose can potentially be reduced by careful selection of standard CT techniques. Users of CT systems should be aware of radiation dose delivered with CT, dose ranges associated with different systems, and doses delivered with their particular unit, which requires that dose performance of CT systems be assessed by means of a protocol that allows comparison of data collected for identical and/or different units.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. A. Mettler Jr, W. Huda, T. T. Yoshizumi, and M. Mahesh Effective Doses in Radiology and Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine: A Catalog Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 254 - 263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Cohnen, H.-J. Wittsack, S. Assadi, K. Muskalla, A. Ringelstein, L.W. Poll, A. Saleh, and U. Modder Radiation exposure of patients in comprehensive computed tomography of the head in acute stroke. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2006; 27(8): 1741 - 1745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Tsapaki, J. E. Aldrich, R. Sharma, M. A. Staniszewska, A. Krisanachinda, M. Rehani, A. Hufton, C. Triantopoulou, P. N. Maniatis, J. Papailiou, et al. Dose Reduction in CT while Maintaining Diagnostic Confidence: Diagnostic Reference Levels at Routine Head, Chest, and Abdominal CT--IAEA-coordinated Research Project Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 828 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Spelic, R. V. Kaczmarek, and O. H. Suleiman Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends Survey of Abdomen and Lumbosacral Spine Radiography Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 115 - 125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Mayo, J. Aldrich, and N. L. Muller Radiation Exposure at Chest CT: A Statement of the Fleischner Society Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 15 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E T H Wong, S K Yu, M Lai, Y C Wong, and P C Lau MAPD--an objective way to select mAs for paediatric brain CT Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2001; 74(886): 932 - 937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Nickoloff and P. O. Alderson Radiation Exposures to Patients from CT: Reality, Public Perception, and Policy Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2001; 177(2): 285 - 287. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Brenner, C. D. Elliston, E. J. Hall, and W. E. Berdon Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2001; 176(2): 289 - 296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Hidajat, M. Wolf, A. Nunnemann, P. Liersch, B. Gebauer, U. Teichgräber, R. J. Schröder, and R. Felix Survey of Conventional and Spiral CT Doses Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 395 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Cohnen, H. Fischer, J. Hamacher, E. Lins, R. Kötter, and U. Mödder CT of the Head by Use of Reduced Current and Kilovoltage: Relationship between Image Quality and Dose Reduction AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2000; 21(9): 1654 - 1660. [Abstract] [Full Text]