Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Casola, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Casola, G.

Radiology, Vol 184, 201-205, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

CT guidance for percutaneous gastrostomy and gastroenterostomy

RB Sanchez, E vanSonnenberg, HB D'Agostino, BW Goodacre, P Moyers and G Casola
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, Medical Center 92103.

The authors describe the value of computed tomographic (CT) guidance for percutaneous gastrostomy (PG) or gastroenterostomy (PGE) in 22 patients with anatomic or pathologic difficulties precluding fluoroscopic guidance. Indications for PG or PGE were decompression for gastrointestinal obstruction (n = 15) or for feeding (n = 7). Thirteen patients previously underwent an unsuccessful attempt at or had been rejected as unsuitable for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. CT guidance was selected because of inability to pass a nasogastric tube due to esophageal obstruction (n = 4), inability to tolerate gastric distention (n = 1), abnormal morphology in or around the stomach (n = 16), or simultaneous performance of a PG in one patient who was undergoing emergency CT-guided abscess drainage. Catheters were placed successfully in all 22 patients. No major complications occurred. CT is valuable for PG or PGE when anatomic or pathologic problems make fluoroscopic or endoscopic puncture unsafe or impossible.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.