Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avizonis, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Berbaum, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Avizonis, V. N.
Right arrow Articles by Berbaum, K. S.

Radiology, Vol 184, 275-279, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Three-dimensional viewing of and dosimetric calculations in Au-198 implants of the prostate

VN Avizonis, DH Hussey, KM Anderson, SK Jani and KS Berbaum
Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.

A three-dimensional system for dosimetric calculation of radiation from interstitial brachytherapeutic implants was developed and was compared with conventional dosimetry performed with a commercial two-dimensional system. Software programs written for this study enabled the authors to place radioactive sources in the correct reconstructed anatomic locations, compute the isodose distribution around these sources, and display the isodose curves in their correct relationship to anatomic structures. Eight radiation oncologists evaluated the usefulness of both systems. Verification studies in phantoms and in 20 patients with gold-198 implants in the prostate gland showed that the experimental system was very accurate in volume reconstruction, seed localization, isodose distribution, point-dose calculation, and computation of dose- volume histograms. Although the dose depictions in the two systems matched almost exactly, statistically significant differences existed in interpretation of the dosimetric data generated by both systems. For example, the oncologists consistently believed that the dose to the prostate was lower when the three-dimensional system was used (P less than or equal to .0001).





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.