Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Logan-Young, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Janus, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Logan-Young, W. W.
Right arrow Articles by Janus, J. A.

Radiology, Vol 184, 49-53, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Fine-needle aspiration cytology in the detection of breast cancer in nonsuspicious lesions

WW Logan-Young, NY Hoffman and JA Janus
Breast Clinic of Rochester, NY 14620.

In 1988, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was performed on 222 consecutive patients who underwent screening mammography and had benign- appearing opacities. FNAC was also performed in 2,248 consecutive symptomatic patients with clinically palpable masses and mammograms that were considered within normal limits. FNAC, performed with a 23- gauge needle, helped detect three unsuspected cancers in the 222 screened patients and eight unsuspected malignancies in the 2,248 symptomatic patients. Only one of every 225 nonsuspicious masses proved to be malignant, but, without FNAC, there would have been no way to know which mass was a newly surfacing carcinoma. FNAC not only helped detect early cancers, but its negative findings resulted in sparing patients the ordeal of surgical biopsy for benign conditions. The low lymph node metastatic rate of 18% suggests that patients with FNAC- depicted cancers have a prognosis as promising as those patients with mammographically detected malignancies.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. A. Dennis, S. H. Parker, A. J. Klaus, A. T. Stavros, T. I. Kaske, and S. B. Clark
Breast Biopsy Avoidance: The Value of Normal Mammograms and Normal Sonograms in the Setting of a Palpable Lump
Radiology, April 1, 2001; 219(1): 186 - 191.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. B. Kopans, K. K. Lindfors, L. P. Howell, D. Thickman, S. Parker, D. Clark, W. W. Logan-Young, N. Y. Hoffman, J. A. Janus, and W. L. Donegan
Evaluation of a Breast Mass
N. Engl. J. Med., March 18, 1993; 328(11): 810 - 812.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.