Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doornbos, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Vigliotti, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doornbos, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Vigliotti, A. P.

Radiology, Vol 184, 333-339, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Results of radical perineal prostatectomy with adjuvant brachytherapy

JF Doornbos, DH Hussey, RA Robinson, BC Wen and AP Vigliotti
Department of Radiology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City 52242-1009.

Retrospective analysis of outcome in 137 patients who underwent radical perineal prostatectomy and bilateral injection of gold-198 implants into the periprostatic tissues and/or neurovascular pedicles as treatment for prostatic adenocarcinoma was performed. Patients had undergone treatment between 1975 and 1985. Local recurrence developed in 22 patients (16.1%) and distant metastases developed in 33 (24.1%). Clinical and surgical staging of disease and Gleason grading of pathologic specimens were performed retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier local recurrence, freedom from relapse (FFR), and survival rates decreased with increasing stage and pathologic grade. With clinical staging, these rates were not statistically different from previous rates achieved with external beam radiation therapy, and with pathologic staging, they were not statistically different from previous rates achieved with prostatectomy. The authors conclude that (a) 5-year follow-up is inadequate to determine local control rates after prostatectomy; (b) use of implants did not improve local control, FFR, or survival rates of 10 years; and (c) method of staging probably has more effect on local control, FFR, and survival rates than does treatment modality.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.