Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v185,p616)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newstead, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Toth, H. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newstead, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Toth, H. K.

Radiology, Vol 184, 623-627, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma: mammographic findings and stage at diagnosis [published erratum appears in Radiology 1992 Nov;185(2):616]

GM Newstead, PB Baute and HK Toth
Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016.

The authors reviewed 316 cases of breast carcinoma diagnosed from January 1, 1986, to December 31, 1989. Clinical data and mammograms were available for all patients. Of the 316 carcinomas, 272 (86.1%) were invasive; 37 (13.6%) of these represented pure invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). Twenty-five (68.5%) of the 37 patients with ILC and 161 (70.3%) of the 229 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) presented with clinically palpable masses. Asymmetric opacities and architectural distortion were the predominant mammographic signs in 21 (57%) of the cases of ILC but only 32 (13.6%) of the cases of IDC. Malignant calcifications were not present in any of the patients with ILC but were present in 110 (47%) of those with IDC. Of the ILC lesions, 29 (85%) [corrected] had the same opacity as that of normal fibroglandular tissue, and the mammographic findings were often subtle and seen initially on one view only. There was no substantial difference in the TNM stage at diagnosis between the two study groups.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
S GARNETT, M WALLIS, and G MORGAN
Do screen-detected lobular and ductal carcinoma present with different mammographic features?
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2009; 82(973): 20 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey
Unusual Breast Cancers: Useful Clues to Expanding the Differential Diagnosis
Radiology, March 1, 2007; 242(3): 683 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
H. Zhao, A. Langerod, Y. Ji, K. W. Nowels, J. M. Nesland, R. Tibshirani, I. K. Bukholm, R. Karesen, D. Botstein, A.-L. Borresen-Dale, et al.
Different Gene Expression Patterns in Invasive Lobular and Ductal Carcinomas of the Breast
Mol. Biol. Cell, June 1, 2004; 15(6): 2523 - 2536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. P. Evans, L. J. Warren Burhenne, L. Laurie, K. F. O'Shaughnessy, and R. A. Castellino
Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast: Mammographic Characteristics and Computer-aided Detection
Radiology, October 1, 2002; 225(1): 182 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C.-L. Chen, N. S. Weiss, P. Newcomb, W. Barlow, and E. White
Hormone Replacement Therapy in Relation to Breast Cancer
JAMA, February 13, 2002; 287(6): 734 - 741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Harvey, R. E. Fechner, and M. M. Moore
Apparent Ipsilateral Decrease in Breast Size at Mammography: A Sign of Infiltrating Lobular Carcinoma
Radiology, March 1, 2000; 214(3): 883 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W. A. Berg and P. L. Gilbreath
Multicentric and Multifocal Cancer: Whole-Breast US in Preoperative Evaluation1
Radiology, January 1, 2000; 214(1): 59 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.