Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ritchie, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, Y.

Radiology, Vol 185, 37-42, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Minimum scan speeds for suppression of motion artifacts in CT

CJ Ritchie, JD Godwin, CR Crawford, W Stanford, H Anno and Y Kim
Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

Cardiac and ventilatory motions cause artifacts at chest computed tomography (CT). To determine how short the scan times on third- generation units must be to avoid such artifacts, motion was measured with fast and ultrafast CT scans. Minimum detectable motion was then determined. The longest scan time that avoided a barely perceptible artifact was calculated by dividing the minimum detectable motion by the peak physiologic velocity. The posterior left ventricular wall moved at a maximum velocity of 52.5 mm/sec, necessitating a scan time of 19.1 msec or less to avoid artifact. Lung vessels near the heart moved at 40.5 mm/sec for a scan time of 24.7 msec or less. During quiet breathing, pulmonary vessels moved at 10.7 mm/sec for a scan time of 93.5 msec or less. The authors conclude that the shortest scan time on third-generation units (0.6 second) cannot prevent all artifacts arising from motion in the chest. Even ultrafast scan times (50 msec) are not short enough to eliminate artifacts on these units. Thus, reduction of motion artifacts will require techniques other than fast scanning.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. A. Bluemke, S. Achenbach, M. Budoff, T. C. Gerber, B. Gersh, L. D. Hillis, W. G. Hundley, W. J. Manning, B. F. Printz, M. Stuber, et al.
Noninvasive Coronary Artery Imaging: Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
Circulation, July 29, 2008; 118(5): 586 - 606.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. E. Clouse, A. Sabir, C.-S. Yam, N. Yoshimura, S. Lin, F. Welty, P. Martinez-Clark, and V. Raptopoulos
Measuring Noncalcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Using Voxel Analysis with MDCT Angiography: A Pilot Clinical Study
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1553 - 1560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Matsuura, J. Horiguchi, H. Yamamoto, N. Hirai, T. Tonda, N. Kohno, and K. Ito
Optimal Cardiac Phase for Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on Single-Source 64-MDCT Scanner: Least Interscan Variability and Least Motion Artifacts
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): 1561 - 1568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Grosjean, B. Sauer, R. M. Guerra, M. Daudon, A. Blum, J. Felblinger, and J. Hubert
Characterization of Human Renal Stones with MDCT: Advantage of Dual Energy and Limitations Due to Respiratory Motion
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2008; 190(3): 720 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
F. Liu, C. Cuevas, A. A. Moss, O. Kolokythas, T. J. Dubinsky, and P. E. Kinahan
Gas Bubble Motion Artifact in MDCT
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2008; 190(2): 294 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Husmann, S. Leschka, L. Desbiolles, T. Schepis, O. Gaemperli, B. Seifert, P. Cattin, T. Frauenfelder, T. G. Flohr, B. Marincek, et al.
Coronary Artery Motion and Cardiac Phases: Dependency on Heart Rate Implications for CT Image Reconstruction
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 567 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Dewey, M. Muller, S. Eddicks, D. Schnapauff, F. Teige, W. Rutsch, A. C. Borges, and B. Hamm
Evaluation of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Function With 16-Slice Computed Tomography, Biplane Cineventriculography, and Two-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography: Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 21, 2006; 48(10): 2034 - 2044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. J. Budoff, S. Achenbach, R. S. Blumenthal, J. J. Carr, J. G. Goldin, P. Greenland, A. D. Guerci, J. A.C. Lima, D. J. Rader, G. D. Rubin, et al.
Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology
Circulation, October 17, 2006; 114(16): 1761 - 1791.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. I. Ha, H. W. Goo, J. B. Seo, J.-W. Song, and J. S. Lee
Effects of high-resolution CT of the lung using partial versus full reconstruction on motion artifacts and image noise.
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2006; 187(3): 618 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. F. Bruzzi, M. Remy-Jardin, D. Delhaye, A. Teisseire, C. Khalil, and J. Remy
When, Why, and How to Examine the Heart During Thoracic CT: Part 1, Basic Principles
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2006; 186(2): 324 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Horiguchi, Y. Shen, Y. Akiyama, N. Hirai, K. Sasaki, M. Ishifuro, T. Nakanishi, and K. Ito
Electron Beam CT Versus 16-MDCT on the Variability of Repeated Coronary Artery Calcium Measurements in a Variable Heart Rate Phantom
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2005; 185(4): 995 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
T. H. Kim, J. Hur, S. J. Kim, H. S. Kim, B. W. Choi, K. O. Choe, Y. W. Yoon, and H. M. Kwon
Two-Phase Reconstruction for the Assessment of Left Ventricular Volume and Function Using Retrospective ECG-Gated MDCT: Comparison with Echocardiography
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2005; 185(2): 319 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. H. Mahnken, M. Katoh, P. Bruners, E. Spuentrup, J. E. Wildberger, R. W. Gunther, and A. Buecker
Acute Myocardial Infarction: Assessment of Left Ventricular Function with 16-Detector Row Spiral CT versus MR Imaging--Study in Pigs
Radiology, July 1, 2005; 236(1): 112 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. J. Schoepf, C. R. Becker, B. M. Ohnesorge, and E. K. Yucel
CT of Coronary Artery Disease
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 18 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Horiguchi, H. Yamamoto, Y. Akiyama, K. Marukawa, N. Hirai, and K. Ito
Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using 16-MDCT and a Retrospective ECG-Gating Reconstruction Algorithm
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2004; 183(1): 103 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
H. S. Choi, B. W. Choi, K. O. Choe, D. Choi, K.-J. Yoo, M.-I. Kim, and J. Kim
Pitfalls, Artifacts, and Remedies in Multi- Detector Row CT Coronary Angiography
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2004; 24(3): 787 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. Boehm, J. K. Willmann, P. R. Hilfiker, D. Weishaupt, B. Seifert, D. W. Crook, B. Marincek, and S. Wildermuth
Thin-Section CT of the Lung: Does Electrocardiographic Triggering Influence Diagnosis?
Radiology, November 1, 2003; 229(2): 483 - 491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. R. Van Hoe, K. G. De Meerleer, P. Ph. Leyman, and P. K. Vanhoenacker
Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring Using ECG-Gated Multidetector CT: Effect of Individually Optimized Image-Reconstruction Windows on Image Quality and Measurement Reproducibility
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2003; 181(4): 1093 - 1100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Arac, A. Y. Oner, H. Celik, S. Akpek, and S. Isik
Lung at Thin-Section CT: Influence of Multiple-Segment Reconstruction on Image Quality
Radiology, October 1, 2003; 229(1): 195 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Hong, K. T. Bae, T. K. Pilgram, and F. Zhu
Coronary Artery Calcium Quantification at Multi-Detector Row CT: Influence of Heart Rate and Measurement Methods on Interacquisition Variability—Initial Experience
Radiology, July 1, 2003; 228(1): 95 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Albers, J. M. Boese, C. F. Vahl, and S. Hagl
In vivo validation of cardiac spiral computed tomography using retrospective gating
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2003; 75(3): 885 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. Lu, N. Zhuang, S.-S. Mao, J. Child, S. Carson, H. Bakhsheshi, and M. J. Budoff
EKG-triggered CT Data Acquisition to Reduce Variability in Coronary Arterial Calcium Score
Radiology, September 1, 2002; 224(3): 838 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Horiguchi, T. Nakanishi, and K. Ito
Quantification of Coronary Artery Calcium Using Multidetector CT and a Retrospective ECG-Gating Reconstruction Algorithm
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2001; 177(6): 1429 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C. Hong, C. R. Becker, A. Huber, U. J. Schoepf, B. Ohnesorge, A. Knez, R. Bruning, and M. F. Reiser
ECG-gated Reconstructed Multi-Detector Row CT Coronary Angiography: Effect of Varying Trigger Delay on Image Quality
Radiology, September 1, 2001; 220(3): 712 - 717.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
B. Lu, R. Dai, H. Bai, S. He, B. Jing, N. Zhuang, R. Gao, Y. Yang, J. Chen, and M. J. Budoff
Evaluation of Electron Beam Tomographic Coronary Arteriography with Three-Dimensional Reconstruction in Healthy Subjects
Angiology, November 1, 2000; 51(11): 895 - 904.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
C. H. McCollough, M. R. Bruesewitz, T. R. Daly, and F. E. Zink
Motion Artifacts in Subsecond Conventional CT and Electron-Beam CT: Pictorial Demonstration of Temporal Resolution
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2000; 20(6): 1675 - 1681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
P. Raggi, T. Q. Callister, N. J. Lippolis, and D. J. Russo
Is Mitral Valve Prolapse Due to Cardiac Entrapment in the Chest Cavity?: A CT View
Chest, March 1, 2000; 117(3): 636 - 642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
C. R. Becker, T. F. Jakobs, S. Aydemir, A. Becker, A. Knez, U. J. Schoepf, R. Bruening, R. Haberl, and M. F. Reiser
Helical and Single-Slice Conventional CT Versus Electron Beam CT for the Quantification of Coronary Artery Calcification
Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 543 - 547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
U. J. Schoepf, C. R. Becker, R. D. Bruening, T. Helmberger, A. Staebler, P. Leimeister, and M. F. Reiser
Electrocardiographically Gated Thin-Section CT of the Lung
Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 649 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.