Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doughty, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gift, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doughty, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gift, D. A.

Radiology, Vol 185, 53-61, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Deployment and utilization of MR imaging in Michigan: observations of a statewide data base

A Doughty, SI Nash and DA Gift
Michigan Department of Public Health, Lansing.

Patterns of deployment and utilization of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were studied with a Michigan Department of Public Health data base containing data regarding more than 218,000 patient visits. Michigan currently has 16 hospital-based fixed MR systems (magnets), 14 (13 operational) freestanding fixed magnets, and 11 (10 operational) mobile magnets operating at 45 host sites. The imaging volume for 1991 was approximately 127,000 procedures, with associated charges of $126,500,000. Central nervous system imaging accounted for 82.6% of procedure volume, with extremities accounting for another 12.9%. The average total charge per procedure ranged from $844 to $1,076, and the average professional charge per procedure ranged from $178 to $226. The annual throughput ranged from 1,356 to 7,480 procedures per magnet. Wide variation in many measures was observed both within and among hospital-based, freestanding, and mobile facility types. The use of computed tomography (CT) before MR imaging for the same diagnostic problem continues to be substantial (average, 44% for MR imaging of the head). Patterns of inpatient imaging and prior use of CT indicate that the technical benefit of mobile MR imaging should be investigated further.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.