Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldsmith, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldsmith, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Larson, D. A.

Radiology, Vol 185, 71-76, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Optic neuropathy after irradiation of meningioma

BJ Goldsmith, SA Rosenthal, WM Wara and DA Larson
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0226.

Radiation-induced optic neuropathy (RON) is a rare and catastrophic complication of currently employed radiation therapy regimens for meningiomas that have been partially resected and sampled for biopsy. Between 1972 and 1989, 49 patients received postoperative irradiation for partially resected or biopsy sampled meningiomas, with the optic nerve within the treatment field. One patient experienced RON. The latency period for this case was 23 months. A review of the literature disclosed few cases of RON after treatment for meningioma; however, 42 cases of RON have been reported after radiation therapy for other lesions. The authors constructed two approaches to predict optic nerve radiation tolerance. The first is modeled on a previous proposal for a neural tissue nominal standard dose term and enabled accurate prediction of safe treatment regimens and risk of RON. This approach compared favorably with previously employed nominal standard dose terms. The second approach, based on the linear-quadratic model, proved unsuccessful due to its failure to achieve statistical significance.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.