Radiology, Vol 185, 469-474, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America

ARTICLES

Spiral CT: decreased spatial resolution in vivo due to broadening of section-sensitivity profile

JA Brink, JP Heiken, DM Balfe, SS Sagel, J DiCroce and MW Vannier
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110.

Comparable conventional and spiral computed tomographic (CT) scanning protocols for transaxial (n = 30) and multiplanar reformation (MPR) (n = 15) imaging were performed to image the adrenal gland and the upper pole of the right kidney in the same patient, without use of intravenously administered contrast media. The sharpness of soft-tissue- fat interfaces oriented in the transverse (xy) and longitudinal (z) directions was measured as the maximum and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the edge attenuation profile first derivative. Edge sharpness was qualitatively assessed by three blinded reviewers, who used a four- point scale. In vivo transaxial CT studies showed that the conventional scans produced slightly sharper edges than the spiral scans (mean difference of spiral and conventional FWHM = 0.30 mm [P < .05] [in z direction] and 0.21 mm [P < .05] [in xy direction]). In vivo MPR studies showed that interfaces in the xy plane were significantly less sharp with spiral scanning, whereas interfaces in the z direction were equivalent for conventional and spiral scanning (mean difference of spiral and conventional FWHM = 0.03 mm [P > .05] [in z direction] and 1.19 mm [P < .05] [in xy direction]). Significant respiratory misregistration was present on seven of 15 (47%) conventional MPR scans and on no spiral MPR scans.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K Imai, M Ikeda, S Wada, Y Enchi, and T Niimi Analysis of streak artefacts on CT images using statistics of extremes Br. J. Radiol., November 1, 2007; 80(959): 911 - 918. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. C. Dalrymple, S. R. Prasad, M. W. Freckleton, and K. N. Chintapalli Informatics in Radiology (infoRAD): Introduction to the Language of Three-dimensional Imaging with Multidetector CT RadioGraphics, September 1, 2005; 25(5): 1409 - 1428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Belden, N. Weg, L. B. Minor, and S. J. Zinreich CT Evaluation of Bone Dehiscence of the Superior Semicircular Canal as a Cause of Sound- and/or Pressure-induced Vertigo Radiology, February 1, 2003; 226(2): 337 - 343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Engelke, C. Schaefer-Prokop, E. Schirg, J. Freihorst, S. Grubnic, and M. Prokop High-Resolution CT and CT Angiography of Peripheral Pulmonary Vascular Disorders RadioGraphics, July 1, 2002; 22(4): 739 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. N. Pappas, L. F. Donnelly, and D. P. Frush Reduced Frequency of Sedation of Young Children with Multisection Helical CT Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 897 - 899. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				C. H. Coulam, D. H. Sheafor, R. A. Leder, E. K. Paulson, D. M. DeLong, and R. C. Nelson Evaluation of Pseudoenhancement of Renal Cysts During Contrast-Enhanced CT Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2000; 174(2): 493 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Brink, G. Wang, and E. G. McFarland Optimal Section Spacing in Single-Detector Helical CT Radiology, February 1, 2000; 214(2): 575 - 578. [Abstract] [Full Text]