Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, A. B.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, P.

Radiology, Vol 185, 759-762, Copyright © 1992 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Twin pregnancies: accuracy of first-trimester abdominal US in predicting chorionicity and amnionicity

AB Kurtz, RJ Wapner, J Mata, A Johnson and P Morgan
Department of Radiology, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5091.

A first-trimester transabdominal ultrasound (US) study was performed on twin pregnancies to determine the utility of US in predicting chorionicity and amnionicity. Among 85 dichorionic-diamniotic (DC-DA) twin pairs, a thick membrane was present in 78 (92%). Four of the DC-DA cases without a thick membrane had two distinct placental sites, allowing 82 DC-DA pregnancies (96%) to be predicted. Among 16 monochorionic-diamniotic (MC-DA) twin pairs, a thin membrane was present in 14 (88%). None of the four monochorionic-monoamniotic (MC- MA) cases had an identifiable membrane. The lambda sign had no value in this evaluation and was actually misleading, while a thick membrane or the identification of two separate placentas was always predictive of DC-DA twinning. However, a thin membrane, while usually predictive of an MC-DA pregnancy, did not exclude a DC-DA gestation. When no membrane is present, an MC-MA gestation is probable; however, a diamniotic pregnancy may still be present, and further evaluation is suggested.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1992 by the Radiological Society of North America.