|
|
||||||||
Radiology, Vol 186, 195-201, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America
ARTICLES |
NM Rofsky, JC Weinreb, EA Grossi, AC Galloway, RB Libes, SB Colvin and DP Naidich
Department of Radiology, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016.
The normal range of postoperative imaging findings are described in 34 asymptomatic patients studied 5-66 months (mean, 28 months) after undergoing the continuous-suture graft-inclusion technique for repair of aortic aneurysms (n = 20) and dissections (n = 14) involving the ascending aorta. All 34 patients underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and 24 patients also underwent computed tomography (CT). Perigraft thickening was seen in 19 patients (56%) with MR imaging and in eight patients (33%) with CT. Flow outside the graft but contained within the native wrap was noted in five patients (15%) with MR imaging and in four patients (17%) with contrast material-enhanced CT. Thrombus was identified outside the graft and within the wrap in seven patients (21%) with MR imaging and in six patients (25%) with CT. Mass effect on the graft was depicted in four patients (12%) with MR imaging and in three patients (13%) with CT. Of the 14 patients who underwent repair of aortic dissections, an intimal flap was seen distal to the graft in seven of the 14 (50%) evaluated with MR imaging and in four of the 10 (40%) evaluated with contrast-enhanced CT. An accurate postoperative imaging evaluation requires precise knowledge of the surgical technique performed and its anatomic consequences.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. K. Hoang, S. Martinez, and L. M. Hurwitz MDCT Angiography After Open Thoracic Aortic Surgery: Pearls and Pitfalls Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2009; 192(1): W20 - W27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Patel and R. R. Arora Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of aortic dissection Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, December 1, 2008; 2(6): 439 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Sundaram, L. E. Quint, S. Patel, H. J. Patel, and G. M. Deeb CT Appearance of Thoracic Aortic Graft Complications Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2007; 188(5): 1273 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Garcia, J. Ferreiros, M. Santamaria, A. Bustos, J. L. Abades, and N. Santamaria MR Angiographic Evaluation of Complications in Surgically Treated Type A Aortic Dissection. RadioGraphics, July 1, 2006; 26(4): 981 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. Kunz, K. Oberholzer, W. Kuroczynski, G. Horstick, F. Krummenauer, M. Thelen, and K.-F. Kreitner Assessment of Chronic Aortic Dissection: Contribution of Different ECG-Gated Breath-Hold MRI Techniques Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1319 - 1326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. A. Khan and C. K. Nair Clinical, Diagnostic, and Management Perspectives of Aortic Dissection* Chest, July 1, 2002; 122(1): 311 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Riley, S Rooney, R Bonser, and P Guest Imaging the post-operative thoracic aorta: normal anatomy and pitfalls Br. J. Radiol., December 1, 2001; 74(888): 1150 - 1158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. E. Quint, I. R. Francis, D. M. Williams, H. M. Monaghan, and G. M. Deeb Synthetic Interposition Grafts of the Thoracic Aorta: Postoperative Appearance on Serial CT Studies Radiology, May 1, 1999; 211(2): 317 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| RADIOLOGY | RADIOGRAPHICS | RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE |