Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Becker, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Becker, J.

Radiology, Vol 186, 213-220, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Use of preprocedural tests by interventional radiologists

TP Murphy, GS Dorfman and J Becker
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence 02903.

A direct survey was taken of 1,238 members of the Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology (SCVIR) concerning the routine use of 14 tests (most frequently, prothrombin and partial thromboplastin times, complete blood cell counts, and blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels) performed before 10 invasive percutaneous procedures (peripheral angiography, neuroangiography, transluminal angioplasty, thrombolysis, percutaneous needle biopsy, abscess drainage, percutaneous nephrostomy, biliary drainage, myelography, and venography). The survey was undertaken to determine the current practices and appropriateness of current routine use of preprocedural tests. The response rate was 34%, representing a cumulative annual volume of 322,208 cases. The practice of performing routine preprocedural tests is common among interventional radiologists. Data provided by this survey suggest that use of these tests is excessive. Adherence to suggested proposals derived from previously reported experience would result in an annual estimated savings of $20.0-$34.9 million (extrapolated for all procedures performed by SCVIR members in 1989).





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.