Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, C. S.

Radiology, Vol 186, 399-404, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Computed equalization radiography: preliminary clinical evaluation

LR Goodman, CR Wilson and CS Kim
Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.

Computed Equalization Radiography (CER) was designed to increase visualization of mediastinal structures without affecting lung contrast. CER optimizes the image by obtaining two 1-second fan beam scans. The initial low-dose prescan determines the location of the lungs by means of a stationary krypton gas detector. During the equalization scan, this information is used to position 35 beam attenuators in real time so as to increase exposure of the mediastinum while maintaining ideal optical density over the lungs. Eight observers analyzed 20 pairs of posteroanterior (PA) and lateral radiographs obtained on conventional and CER units. On the PA images, three of four mediastinal areas analyzed were visualized better in CER images, while there was no difference in lung detail. There were no appreciable differences in the lateral projection between the CER and conventional images. Contrast on the PA radiograph was preferred on the CER image. CER provided modest improvement in visualization of mediastinal structures and maintained lung contrast without degrading lung detail on the PA image. CER had no major effect on visualization in the lateral images.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. V. Kaczmarek, B. J. Conway, R. O. Slayton, and O. H. Suleiman
Results of a Nationwide Survey of Chest Radiography: Comparison with Results of a Previous Study
Radiology, June 1, 2000; 215(3): 891 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.