Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Caligiuri, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, L. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Caligiuri, P.
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, L. B.

Radiology, Vol 186, 471-474, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Computerized radiographic analysis of osteoporosis: preliminary evaluation

P Caligiuri, ML Giger, MJ Favus, H Jia, K Doi and LB Dixon
Kurt Rossmann Laboratories for Radiologic Image Research, Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, IL 60637.

Measurement of bone mass is important in determining the risk for fracture and in following the course of patients undergoing therapy for osteoporosis. Bone mineral densitometry (BMD) is a good predictor of fracture risk, but there is considerable overlap in BMD measurements between individuals with fracture risk and those without. In this study, computerized texture analysis of the trabecular pattern on conventional spine radiographs was used to evaluate bone structure as a determinant of fracture risk. Standard lumbar spine radiographs of 43 individuals were analyzed and compared with BMD measurements obtained with dual-photon absorptiometry. This method was more effective than BMD in differentiation of patients with fractures elsewhere in the spine from those with no fracture. These preliminary results suggest that this method of bone structure analysis, combined with BMD, may lead to a more sensitive and specific predictor of osteoporosis and risk of fracture.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
S. White, K. Atchison, J. Gornbein, A Nattiv, A Paganini-Hill, S. Service, and D. Yoon
Change in mandibular trabecular pattern and hip fracture rate in elderly women
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., May 1, 2005; 34(3): 168 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Dentomaxillofac RadiolHome page
S Kiyohara, T Sakurai, and I Kashima
Early detection of radiation-induced structural changes in rat trabecular bone
Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., January 1, 2003; 32(1): 30 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
T.D. Faber, D.C. Yoon, and S.C. White
Fourier Analysis Reveals Increased Trabecular Spacing in Sickle Cell Anemia
J. Dent. Res., March 1, 2002; 81(3): 214 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
T. M. Link, A. Lotter, F. Beyer, S. Christiansen, D. Newitt, Y. Lu, C. Schmid, and S. Majumdar
Changes in Calcaneal Trabecular Bone Structure after Heart Transplantation: An MR Imaging Study
Radiology, December 1, 2000; 217(3): 855 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.