Radiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gehl, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gunther, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gehl, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gunther, R. W.

Radiology, Vol 186, 795-798, Copyright © 1993 by Radiological Society of North America


ARTICLES

Mn-DPDP in MR imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: initial clinical experience

HB Gehl, R Urhahn, K Bohndorf, P Klever, S Hauptmann, KP Lodemann, S Matern, V Schumpelick and RW Gunther
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Technical University of Aachen, Germany.

Manganese (II) N,N'-dipyridoxylethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetate 5,5'- bis(phosphate) (DPDP) was tested as a contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 15 patients. At enhanced T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) and enhanced T1-weighted gradient- echo (GRE) imaging, statistically significant increases in signal-to- noise ratio (S/N) for the pancreas (21% and 92%, respectively) and contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N) (91% and 209%, respectively) were found. The C/N at enhanced T1-weighted SE imaging was superior to that at unenhanced imaging, including T2-weighted SE imaging (P = .001). Subjective image analysis showed that delineation of the pancreas and pancreatic tumors was clearly improved (P = .05) on enhanced T1- weighted SE and GRE images compared with on unenhanced T1- and T2- weighted images. The liver enhanced 19% at T1-weighted SE imaging and 90% at T1-weighted GRE imaging. There was a significantly higher S/N increase in hepatic parenchyma than in pancreatic tissue at enhanced T1- weighted GRE imaging (P = .0026) but not at enhanced T1-weighted SE imaging.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Natanzon, A. H. Aletras, L.-Y. Hsu, and A. E. Arai
Determining Canine Myocardial Area at Risk with Manganese-enhanced MR Imaging
Radiology, September 1, 2005; 236(3): 859 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
W. Schima, R. Fugger, E. Schober, C. Oettl, P. Wamser, F. Grabenwoger, J. M. Ryan, and G. Novacek
Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer: Comparison of Mangafodipir Trisodium--Enhanced MR Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced Helical Hydro-CT
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2002; 179(3): 717 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. Bremerich, M. Saeed, H. Arheden, C. B. Higgins, and M. F. Wendland
Normal and Infarcted Myocardium: Differentiation with Cellular Uptake of Manganese at MR Imaging in a Rat Model
Radiology, August 1, 2000; 216(2): 524 - 530.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
RADIOLOGY RADIOGRAPHICS RSNA JOURNALS ONLINE
Copyright © 1993 by the Radiological Society of North America.